Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Trial Sequential Analysis for dichotomous outcomes - a practical guide for systematic review protocols

  • Sophie Juul*
  • , Christian Gunge Riberholt
  • , Markus Harboe Olsen
  • , Joachim Birch Milan
  • , Sigurlaug Hanna Hafliðadóttir
  • , Jeppe Houmann Svanholm
  • , Elisabeth Buck Pedersen
  • , Charles Chin Han Lew
  • , Mark Aninakwah Asante
  • , Johanne Pereira Ribeiro
  • , Vibeke Wagner
  • , Buddheera W M B Kumburegama
  • , Zheng-Yii Lee
  • , Julie Perrine Schaug
  • , Christina Madsen
  • , Christian Gluud
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) is a statistical method to control random errors in systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials. In our results from the Major Mistakes and Errors in Trial Sequential Analysis (METSA) project, we systematically assessed the use of TSA across all medical fields and found significant mistakes in the preplanning and reporting of most TSAs. This article provides a practical guide for authors of systematic review protocols on what to consider when planning Trial Sequential Analysis for dichotomous outcomes.

METHODS: This practical guide has been developed based on the TSA manual, the recommendations published previously by Jakobsen and colleagues and Wetterslev and colleagues along with the findings from our recently published results from the METSA project.

RESULTS: The following five parameters should be clearly defined in a publicly available protocol before the review is undertaken: 1) the proportion of participants with an event in the control group; 2) the relative risk reduction or increase in the experimental group; 3) the risk of type I errors (alpha); 4) the risk of type II errors (beta); and 5) the diversity of the meta-analysis. Improving the planning and reporting of these parameters will improve the interpretation, reproducibility, and validity of Trial Sequential Analysis results used in systematic reviews.

CONCLUSIONS: We hope this practical guide will aid in improving pre-registration and reporting of TSAs of dichotomous outcomes within systematic review protocols with meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Article number272
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Research Design
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical

Fingerprint

Explore the research areas of 'Trial Sequential Analysis for dichotomous outcomes - a practical guide for systematic review protocols'.

Cite this