Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The fraction of long-term sickness absence attributable to work environmental factors: prospective results from the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: To examine the fraction of long-term sickness absence periods attributable to physical and psychosocial work environmental risk factors.

    METHOD: A random population sample was followed for 18 months in a national register of social transfer payments. Mutually adjusted hazard ratios for onset of long-term sickness absence and aetiological fractions were computed.

    RESULTS: After mutual adjustment, no significant effect of psychosocial work environment factors remained. In men, 23% and 28% of long-term sickness absence were attributable to working mainly standing or squatting, and lifting or carrying loads, respectively. In women, 27% of long-term sickness absence was attributable to bending or twisting of the neck or back.

    CONCLUSIONS: Physical work environment exposures explained between 10% and 30% of long-term sickness absence. The potential for reducing long-term sickness absence is substantial.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)487-9
    Number of pages3
    JournalOccupational and Environmental Medicine
    Volume64
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007

    Keywords

    • Accidents, Occupational
    • Adolescent
    • Adult
    • Aged
    • Cohort Studies
    • Denmark
    • Employment
    • Female
    • Humans
    • Lifting
    • Male
    • Middle Aged
    • Occupational Exposure
    • Pain
    • Proportional Hazards Models
    • Risk Factors
    • Sex Factors
    • Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data
    • Time
    • Time Factors
    • Workplace

    Fingerprint

    Explore the research areas of 'The fraction of long-term sickness absence attributable to work environmental factors: prospective results from the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study'.

    Cite this