Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Danish-Norwegian randomized trial on beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction: Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics

  • Anna Meta Dyrvig Kristensen*
  • , John Munkhaugen
  • , Sigrun Halvorsen
  • , Michael Hecht Olsen
  • , Arnhild Bakken
  • , Thomas Steen Gyldenstierne Sehested
  • , Vidar Ruddox
  • , Theis Lange
  • , Morten Wang Fagerland
  • , Christian Torp-Pedersen
  • , Eva Prescott
  • , Dan Atar
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The evidence for beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) is randomized trials conducted more than 30 years ago, and the continued efficacy has been questioned.

DESIGN AND METHODS: The ongoing Danish (DANBLOCK) and Norwegian (BETAMI) randomized beta-blocker trials are joined to evaluate the effectiveness and risks of long-term beta-blocker therapy after MI. Patients with normal or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 40%) will be randomized to open-label treatment with beta-blockers or no such therapy. The event-driven trial will randomize ∼5700 patients and continue until 950 primary endpoints have occurred. As of July 2023, 5228 patients have been randomized. Of the first 4000 patients randomized, median age was 62 years, 79% were men, 48% had a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 84% had a normal LVEF. The primary endpoint is a composite of adjudicated recurrent MI, incident heart failure (HF), coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke, all-cause mortality, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The primary safety endpoint includes a composite of recurrent MI, HF, all-cause mortality, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, or resuscitated cardiac arrest 30 days after randomization. Secondary endpoints include each of the components of the primary endpoint, patient-reported outcomes, and other clinical outcomes linked to beta-blocker therapy. The primary analysis will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. End of follow-up is expected in December 2024.

CONCLUSION: The combined BETAMI-DANBLOCK trial will have the potential to affect current clinical practice for beta-blocker therapy in patients with normal or mildly reduced LVEF after MI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-183
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
Volume10
Issue number3
Early online date28 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2024

Funding

The DANBLOCK trial is supported by grants from the Danish Heart Foundation [18-R124-A8323-22091] and the Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF18OC0034582]. The BETAMI trial has received grants from the Health South-East research program in Norway [2017205] and the Research Council of Norway [302454]. These funding organizations are not otherwise involved in the trial.

FundersFunder number
The Danish Heart Foundation18-R124-A8323-22091
Novo Nordisk FoundationNNF18OC0034582
South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority2017205
Research Council of Norway302454

    Keywords

    • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use
    • Aged
    • Denmark/epidemiology
    • Female
    • Humans
    • Male
    • Middle Aged
    • Multicenter Studies as Topic
    • Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy
    • Norway/epidemiology
    • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    • Recurrence
    • Risk Factors
    • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy
    • Stroke Volume/drug effects
    • Time Factors
    • Treatment Outcome
    • Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects
    • Myocardial infarction
    • Beta-blockers
    • Randomized controlled trial
    • Side-effects
    • Acute coronary syndromes

    Fingerprint

    Explore the research areas of 'The Danish-Norwegian randomized trial on beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction: Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics'.

    Cite this