Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Region Zealand Home
Help & FAQ
Link opens in a new tab
Dansk
English
Search content at Region Zealand
Home
Profiles
Research units
Projects
Research output
Prizes
Activities
Courses
Press/Media
Impacts
Smear misclassification in a cervical cancer screening programme
E. Lynge
, E. Arffmann
, P. Poll
, P. K. Anderson
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
Research
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Explore the research areas of 'Smear misclassification in a cervical cancer screening programme'.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Cervical Cancer Screening
100%
Misclassification
100%
Invasive Cervical Cancer
50%
Pathologist
25%
Odds Ratio
25%
True Positive
25%
Nested Case-control Study
25%
Hyperkeratosis
25%
Disease Status
25%
Screening Services
25%
Result-oriented
25%
Poor Quality
25%
County-level Data
25%
Herpesvirus
25%
Koilocytosis
25%
Preventable Cases
25%
Late Cases
25%
Pap Smear
25%
Dyskeratosis
25%
Medicine and Dentistry
Cervical Cancer
100%
Cervical Cancer Screening
100%
Pathologist
50%
Hyperkeratosis
50%
Papanicolaou Stain
50%
Herpesviridae
50%
Dyskeratosis
50%
Odds Ratio
50%
Diseases
50%
Case-Control Study
50%