Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety, Feasibility, and Potential Clinical Efficacy of 40 Hz Invisible Spectral Flicker versus Placebo in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Pilot Study

  • Mikkel Pejstrup Agger*
  • , Else Rubæk Danielsen
  • , Marcus Schultz Carstensen
  • , N Mai Nguyen
  • , Maibritt Horning
  • , Mark Alexander Henney
  • , Christopher Boe Ravn Jensen
  • , Anders Ohlhues Baandrup
  • , Troels Wesenberg Kjær
  • , Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen
  • , Kamilla Miskowiak
  • , Paul Michael Petersen
  • , Peter Høgh
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggested induction of 40 Hz neural activity as a potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, prolonged exposure to flickering light raises adherence and safety concerns, encouraging investigation of tolerable light stimulation protocols.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, feasibility, and exploratory measures of efficacy.

METHODS: This two-stage randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded clinical trial, recruited first cognitive healthy participants (n = 3/2 active/placebo), and subsequently patients with mild-to-moderate AD (n = 5/6, active/placebo). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either active intervention with 40 Hz Invisible Spectral Flicker (ISF) or placebo intervention with color and intensity matched non-flickering white light.

RESULTS: Few and mild adverse events were observed. Adherence was above 86.1% of intended treatment days, with participants remaining in front of the device for >51.3 min (60 max) and directed gaze >34.9 min. Secondary outcomes of cognition indicate a tendency towards improvement in the active group compared to placebo (mean: -2.6/1.5, SD: 6.58/6.53, active/placebo) at week 6. Changes in hippocampal and ventricular volume also showed no tendency of improvement in the active group at week 6 compared to placebo. At week 12, a potential delayed effect of the intervention was seen on the volume of the hippocampus in the active group compared to placebo (mean: 0.34/-2.03, SD: 3.26/1.18, active/placebo), and the ventricular volume active group (mean: -0.36/2.50, SD: 1.89/2.05, active/placebo), compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION: Treatment with 40 Hz ISF offers no significant safety or adherence concerns. Potential impact on secondary outcomes must be tested in larger scale clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)653-665
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume92
Issue number2
Early online date9 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Funding

This project has received funding from RSSF (R22A657), European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 956325 and Optoceutics.

FundersFunder number
European Union956325

    Keywords

    • Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy
    • Cognition
    • Double-Blind Method
    • Feasibility Studies
    • Humans
    • Pilot Projects
    • Treatment Outcome

    Fingerprint

    Explore the research areas of 'Safety, Feasibility, and Potential Clinical Efficacy of 40 Hz Invisible Spectral Flicker versus Placebo in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Pilot Study'.

    Cite this