Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma: a scoping review

  • Mille Falk Bjørch*
  • , Emma Grundtvig Gram
  • , John Brandt Brodersen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to systematically identify and scrutinise published empirical evidence about overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma and examine how frequent overdiagnosis of melanoma is and whether this is related to different types of interventions or diagnostic technologies.

DESIGN AND SETTING: Empirical studies that discussed overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma were eligible, including qualitative and quantitative studies in any type of population, age group and geographical location. We excluded studies that did not include empirical data, studies that only mentioned 'overdiagnosis' without addressing it further and studies that used the term overdiagnosis for cases of misdiagnosis or false positives.We developed the search strategy in cooperation with an information specialist. We searched five databases on 21 April 2022: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library.This scoping review adheres to The JBI methodology and Prefered Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for inclusion and extracted data from the included studies. The data extracted include study characteristics, population details, research question, the context and the study's main results.

RESULTS: Our search resulted in 1134 potentially relevant studies. 35 studies were included: 29 register studies, 3 cohort studies, 1 case-control study, 1 survey study and 1 randomised controlled trial. Most register studies examined trends in melanoma incidence and/or mortality and found a significant increase in incidence between 0.39% and 6.6% annually and a little or no increase in mortality. Three cohort studies and one case-control study showed that skin screening was associated with increased detection of melanoma; especially in situ or thin invasive melanoma. Three studies estimated the degree of overdiagnosis which ranged from 29% to 60%.

CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological data suggest a high degree of overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma. Studies that examined the association between skin screening and malignant melanoma all found increased detection of melanomas, mostly thin and in situ melanomas, which raises concern about overdiagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-28
Number of pages12
JournalBMJ evidence-based medicine
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date4 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Case-Control Studies
  • Diagnostic Errors
  • Humans
  • Melanoma/diagnosis
  • Overdiagnosis
  • Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis

Fingerprint

Explore the research areas of 'Overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma: a scoping review'.

Cite this