Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Graft patency after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients

  • Christian H. Møller
  • , Mario J. Perko
  • , Jens T. Lund
  • , Lars W. Andersen
  • , Henning Kelbæk
  • , Jan K. Madsen
  • , Christian Gluud
  • , Daniel A. Steinbrchel

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

    Abstract

    Objective. To compare angiographic graft patency in high-risk patients randomly allocated to off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Design. From a randomised, single-centre clinical trial including patients undergoing isolated first-time coronary bypass surgery a subgroup of patients were scheduled to 1-year coronary angiographic follow-up. Patients had 3-vessel disease and a EuroSCORE ≥5. We evaluated graft patency using a patency index (percentage of patent grafts out of the total number of grafts in each patient). Results. One-year angiography was performed in 34 patients undergoing off-pump surgery and 35 patients undergoing on-pump surgery. The mean number of distal anastomoses was 3.38±0.65 in the off-pump group versus 3.46±0.61 in the on-pump group (NS). The number of patients without graft failure was 22 in the off-pump group and 24 in the on-pump group (NS). The overall patency index was 85% in the off-pump group versus 87% in the on-pump group with a mean difference of 2.1%, 95% confidence interval 12.9 to 8.7 (NS). Conclusions. In patients with 3-vessel disease and a high-risk profile we found no statistically significant difference in graft patency between off-pump and on-pump CABG at 1-year coronary angiographic follow-up.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)161-167
    Number of pages7
    JournalScandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
    Volume44
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2010

    Funding

    We acknowledge the staff in cardiac catheterisation laboratory for an excellent collaboration and consultant Jens J. Thiis for meticulously assessment of the cardiac angiograms. We thank The Danish Heart Foundation (08-4-R64-A2029-B948-22480), The Danish Medical Research Council,The Copenhagen Hospital Corporations Medical Research Council, The Rigshospitalet Research Council, Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation, The Gangsted Foundation and Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation for funding the trial.

    Keywords

    • Cardiopulmonary Bypass
    • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    • Off-pump Surgery

    Fingerprint

    Explore the research areas of 'Graft patency after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients'.

    Cite this