Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Generating Items for Measuring Needs-Based Quality of Life and Self-Perceived Health Inequity in Patients with Multimorbidity: Development of the MultiMorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the processes of developing domains and items for the MultiMorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ), a multimorbidity-specific PROM for the assessment of Needs-based QoL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We developed items and domains for the MMQ through 17 qualitative content validity questionnaire interviews with adults with multimorbidity by testing items from an item bank (covering items with content inspired by existing Needs-based QoL measures for single diseases). The interviews alternated between an explorative part and more focused cognitive interview techniques.

RESULTS: Testing the 47 items from the first draft of the MMQ items showed that the Needs-based approach as a framework did not cover all the QoL aspects our informants stated as being important. Therefore, the conceptual framework was supplemented by Self-perceived health inequity, and new items were generated. MMQ, measuring Needs-based QoL (MMQ1) and Self-perceived health inequity (MMQ2), was assembled. MMQ1 covers the domains: "Physical ability" (10 items), "Limitations in everyday life" (15 items), "Worries" (11 items), "My social life" (11 items), "Self-image" (12 items), and "Personal finances" (2 items). Self-perceived health inequity proved to be a relevant framework for other aspects of QoL not covered by the Needs-based approach to QoL. MMQ2 covers the domains: "Experiences of being stigmatized" (five items), "Experiences of not being seen and heard" (four items), "Insufficient understanding of the burden of disease" (three items) and "Experiences of feeling powerless" (five items).

CONCLUSION: We have developed the final MMQ draft, a multimorbidity-specific PROM for the assessment of Needs-based QoL (MMQ1) and Self-perceived health inequity (MMQ2) with high content validity (regarding content relevance and comprehensiveness). The final MMQ draft will be assessed for its psychometric properties using Modern Test Theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-282
Number of pages14
JournalPatient related outcome measures
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Funding

This study was funded by Region Zealand, Denmark, and Fonden for Almen Praksis (General Practice Foundation, Denmark) (Grant numbers: A1849, A2013, A2662, A3550) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (Grant number: NNF15OC0019568). Funders have no direct or indirect financial relationship with the authors and no rule or authority in decision about design, collection, management, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report or decision about publication.

FundersFunder number
Region Sjælland
Fonden for Almen PraksisA1849, A2013, A2662, A3550
Novo Nordisk FoundationNNF15OC0019568

    Keywords

    • Health inequity
    • Item generation
    • Multimorbidity
    • Needs-based approach
    • Patient-reported outcome measure
    • Quality of life
    • Self-perceived

    Fingerprint

    Explore the research areas of 'Generating Items for Measuring Needs-Based Quality of Life and Self-Perceived Health Inequity in Patients with Multimorbidity: Development of the MultiMorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ)'.

    Cite this