Fælles effektmål og måleinstrumenter fører til mere betydningsfuld klinisk forskning

Dorthe B Berthelsen; Linea  Thorlacius; Bente Villumsen; Gregor Be Jemec; Robin Christensen

doi:10.61409/V12230799

Fælles effektmål og måleinstrumenter fører til mere betydningsfuld klinisk forskning

Translated title of the contribution: Common efficacy measures and measurement instruments lead to more meaningful clinical research

Dorthe B Berthelsen^*
, Linea Thorlacius
, Bente Villumsen
, Gregor Be Jemec
, Robin Christensen

^*Corresponding author for this work

Dermatology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Abstract

This review describes that a core outcome set (COS) represents a consensus-based minimum set of outcomes to be collected and reported in clinical trials involving a particular disease or population. A COS serves as a guideline for global consensus on which outcome domains should be collected in all clinical trials. After defining what to measure, it becomes crucial to reach consensus on how to measure it. This includes the selection of appropriate outcome measurement instruments with credible measurement properties and interpretable thresholds of meaning.

Translated title of the contribution	Common efficacy measures and measurement instruments lead to more meaningful clinical research
Original language	Danish
Article number	V12230799
Number of pages	8
Journal	Ugeskrift for laeger
Volume	186
Issue number	37
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.61409/V12230799
Publication status	Published - 9 Sept 2024

Access to Document

10.61409/V12230799Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{c9e6e6df8d7e4ba6bd0abaeefa6751fb,

title = "F{\ae}lles effektm{\aa}l og m{\aa}leinstrumenter f{\o}rer til mere betydningsfuld klinisk forskning",

abstract = "This review describes that a core outcome set (COS) represents a consensus-based minimum set of outcomes to be collected and reported in clinical trials involving a particular disease or population. A COS serves as a guideline for global consensus on which outcome domains should be collected in all clinical trials. After defining what to measure, it becomes crucial to reach consensus on how to measure it. This includes the selection of appropriate outcome measurement instruments with credible measurement properties and interpretable thresholds of meaning.",

keywords = "Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Clinical Trials as Topic/standards, Consensus, Biomedical Research/standards, Research Design/standards",

author = "Berthelsen, \{Dorthe B\} and Linea Thorlacius and Bente Villumsen and Jemec, \{Gregor Be\} and Robin Christensen",

note = "Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.",

year = "2024",

month = sep,

day = "9",

doi = "10.61409/V12230799",

language = "Dansk",

volume = "186",

journal = "Ugeskrift for laeger",

issn = "0041-5782",

publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",

number = "37",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fælles effektmål og måleinstrumenter fører til mere betydningsfuld klinisk forskning

AU - Berthelsen, Dorthe B

AU - Thorlacius, Linea

AU - Villumsen, Bente

AU - Jemec, Gregor Be

AU - Christensen, Robin

N1 - Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

PY - 2024/9/9

Y1 - 2024/9/9

N2 - This review describes that a core outcome set (COS) represents a consensus-based minimum set of outcomes to be collected and reported in clinical trials involving a particular disease or population. A COS serves as a guideline for global consensus on which outcome domains should be collected in all clinical trials. After defining what to measure, it becomes crucial to reach consensus on how to measure it. This includes the selection of appropriate outcome measurement instruments with credible measurement properties and interpretable thresholds of meaning.

AB - This review describes that a core outcome set (COS) represents a consensus-based minimum set of outcomes to be collected and reported in clinical trials involving a particular disease or population. A COS serves as a guideline for global consensus on which outcome domains should be collected in all clinical trials. After defining what to measure, it becomes crucial to reach consensus on how to measure it. This includes the selection of appropriate outcome measurement instruments with credible measurement properties and interpretable thresholds of meaning.

KW - Humans

KW - Outcome Assessment, Health Care

KW - Clinical Trials as Topic/standards

KW - Consensus

KW - Biomedical Research/standards

KW - Research Design/standards

U2 - 10.61409/V12230799

DO - 10.61409/V12230799

M3 - Review

C2 - 39323247

SN - 0041-5782

VL - 186

JO - Ugeskrift for laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for laeger

IS - 37

M1 - V12230799

ER -

Fælles effektmål og måleinstrumenter fører til mere betydningsfuld klinisk forskning

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this