Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of intravenous TRO40303 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: MITOCARE study results

  • Dan Atar*
  • , Hakan Arheden
  • , Alain Berdeaux
  • , Jean Louis Bonnet
  • , Marcus Carlsson
  • , Peter Clemmensen
  • , Valerie Cuvier
  • , Nicolas Danchin
  • , Jean Luc Dubois-Randé
  • , Henrik Engblom
  • , David Erlinge
  • , Huseyin Firat
  • , Sigrun Halvorsen
  • , Henrik SteenHansen
  • , Wilfried Hauke
  • , Einar Heiberg
  • , Sasha Koul
  • , Alf Inge Larsen
  • , Philippe Le Corvoisier
  • , Jan Erik Nordrehaug
  • Franck Paganelli, Rebecca M. Pruss, Helene Rousseau, Sophie Schaller, Giles Sonou, Vegard Tuseth, Julien Veys, Eric Vicaut, Svend Eggert Jensen
*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Aim The MITOCARE study evaluated the efficacy and safety of TRO40303 for the reduction of reperfusion injury in patients undergoing revascularization for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods Patients presenting with STEMI within 6 h of the onset of pain randomly received TRO40303 (n = 83) or placebo (n = 80) via i.v. Bolus injection prior to balloon inflation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a double-blind manner. The primary endpoint was infarct size expressed as area under the curve (AUC) for creatine kinase (CK) and for troponin I (TnI) over 3 days. Secondary endpoints included measures of infarct size using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and safety outcomes. Results The median pain-to-balloon time was 180 min for both groups, and the median (mean) door-to-balloon time was 60 (38) min for all sites. Infarct size, as measured by CK and TnI AUCs at 3 days, was not significantly different between treatment groups. There were no significant differences in the CMR-assessed myocardial salvage index (1-infarct size/myocardium at risk) (mean 52 vs. 58% with placebo, P = 0.1000), mean CMR-assessed infarct size (21.9 g vs. 20.0 g, or 17 vs. 15% of LV-mass) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (46 vs. 48%), or in the mean 30-day echocardiographic LVEF (51.5 vs. 52.2%) between TRO40303 and placebo. A greater number of adjudicated safety events occurred in the TRO40303 group for unexplained reasons. Conclusion This study in STEMI patients treated with contemporary mechanical revascularization principles did not show any effect of TRO40303 in limiting reperfusion injury of the ischaemic myocardium.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)112-119
    Number of pages8
    JournalEuropean Heart Journal
    Volume36
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Jan 2015

    Keywords

    • Cardiac reperfusion injury
    • CMR
    • Infarct size
    • Mitochondria
    • Primary PCI
    • STEMI

    Fingerprint

    Explore the research areas of 'Effect of intravenous TRO40303 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: MITOCARE study results'.

    Cite this