Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Balloon Lithotripsy Added to Conventional Preparation Before Stent Implantation in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

  • Andreas T Kristensen*
  • , Evald H Christiansen
  • , Niels R Holm
  • , Henning Kelbæk
  • , Thomas Engstrøm
  • , Karsten Veien
  • , Bent Raungaard
  • , Ola Kleveland
  • , Johan Bennett
  • , Peep Laanmets
  • , Lars Jakobsen
  • , Ole Havndrup
  • , Jacob T Lønborg
  • , Ole Ahlehoff
  • , Allan Iversen
  • , Anil K Vatwani
  • , Nicolaj B Støttrup
  • , Lisette O Jensen
  • , Martin K Christensen
  • , Sune A Haahr-Pedersen
  • Mette G Charlot, Erin E Gabriel, Niels T Olsen
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention in severely calcified lesions is associated with an increased risk for procedural complications and impaired clinical outcomes. Intravascular lithotripsy is a balloon-based technique that uses pressure waves to fracture calcified plaques. However, no randomized evidence supports the routine use of lithotripsy in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding lithotripsy to conventional lesion preparation in severely calcified lesions.

METHODS: In an international and assessor-blinded trial, patients with severely calcified coronary lesions were randomized to lesion preparation with vs without lithotripsy before stent implantation. The primary composite endpoint consisted of procedural failure (failed or no stent delivery, or residual area stenosis ≥20% by optical coherence tomography) or target vessel failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or clinically driven revascularization) at 1 year.

RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were randomized to lithotripsy and 101 patients to conventional lesion preparation. The primary endpoint occurred in 35 patients (35%) in the lithotripsy group vs 52 patients (52%) in the conventional group (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.48-0.97; P = 0.02). Residual area stenosis ≥20% was the most frequent component of the primary endpoint and occurred in 32 patients (32%) in the lithotripsy group vs 45 patients (45%) in the conventional group (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.49-1.04). Safety endpoints did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Adding lithotripsy to lesion preparation using conventional techniques before stent implantation in severely calcified lesions reduced the combined incidence of procedural failure or target vessel failure at 1 year. The reduced incidence was driven primarily by a reduction in residual area stenosis ≥20%. (Balloon Lithoplasty for Preparation of Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions [BALI]; NCT04253171).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)331-341
Number of pages11
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume19
Issue number3
Early online date18 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Feb 2026

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Male
  • Female
  • Vascular Calcification/therapy
  • Aged
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Coronary Artery Disease/therapy
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Stents
  • Middle Aged
  • Time Factors
  • Lithotripsy/adverse effects
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects
  • Risk Factors
  • Coronary Stenosis/therapy
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation
  • Europe
  • Prospective Studies
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Rotational atherectomy
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Lithotripsy
  • Vascular calcification
  • KEY WORDS calcium modification

Fingerprint

Explore the research areas of 'Balloon Lithotripsy Added to Conventional Preparation Before Stent Implantation in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions'.

Cite this