Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A multireader reliability study comparing conventional high-field magnetic resonance imaging with extremity low-field MRI in rheumatoid arthritis

  • Paul Bird*
  • , B. O. Ejbjerg
  • , Marissa Lassere
  • , Mikkel Østergaard
  • , Fiona McQueen
  • , Charles Peterfy
  • , Espen Haavardsholm
  • , Philip O'Connor
  • , Harry Genant
  • , John Edmonds
  • , Paul Emery
  • , Philip G. Conaghan
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The use of extremity low-field magnetic resonance imaging (E-MRI) is increasing, but relatively few data exist on its reproducibility and accuracy in comparison with high-field MRI, especially for multiple readers. The aim of this multireader exercise of rheumatoid arthritis wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints was to assess the intermachine (high vs low-field) agreement and to assess the interreader agreement on high and low-field images. Study findings suggested that E-MRI performs similarly to conventional high-field MRI regarding assessment of bone erosions. However, for synovitis and bone edema, considerable intermachine and interreader variability was found. Further studies are needed before recommendations on multireader E-MRI assessment of these pathologies can be given.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)854-856
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of Rheumatology
    Volume34
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2007

    Keywords

    • Bone edema
    • Erosions
    • Extremity magnetic resonance imaging
    • High-field MRI
    • Reliability
    • Synovitis

    Fingerprint

    Explore the research areas of 'A multireader reliability study comparing conventional high-field magnetic resonance imaging with extremity low-field MRI in rheumatoid arthritis'.

    Cite this