TY - JOUR
T1 - Vaginal dysbiosis - the association with reproductive outcomes in IVF patients
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Maksimovic Celicanin, Milica
AU - Haahr, Thor
AU - Humaidan, Peter
AU - Skafte-Holm, Axel
N1 - Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine impact of vaginal dysbiosis (VD), including bacterial vaginosis (BV) and aerobic vaginitis (AV) on reproductive outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients.RECENT FINDINGS: BV-bacteria (e.g. Gardnerella) and AV-bacteria (e.g. Streptococci and Enterococci) have been identified in the endometrium. However, there is inconclusive evidence whether IVF patients with VD have lower success rates.SUMMARY: The present systematic review and meta-analysis of PubMed/Medline, until December 2023 included 25 studies, involving 6835 IVF patients. Overall VD was defined as an approximation of community state type IV, including BV and AV-type dysbiosis based on either molecular or microscopy methods. Outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), early pregnancy loss (EPL), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR).Vaginal dysbiosis prevalence was 19% [1271/6835, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18-20%]. Six studies examined AV-type dysbiosis with a prevalence of 4% (26/628, 95% CI 3-6%). Vaginal dysbiosis correlates with a higher EPL [relative risk (RR) = 1.49, 95% CI 1.15-1.94] and lower CPR (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95). No statistically significant impact of VD, BV, or AV was found on LBR and BPR.Thus, the association between VD and reproductive outcome remains puzzling as it is difficult to explain how VD impacts CPR and EPL but not LBR and BPR.
AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine impact of vaginal dysbiosis (VD), including bacterial vaginosis (BV) and aerobic vaginitis (AV) on reproductive outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients.RECENT FINDINGS: BV-bacteria (e.g. Gardnerella) and AV-bacteria (e.g. Streptococci and Enterococci) have been identified in the endometrium. However, there is inconclusive evidence whether IVF patients with VD have lower success rates.SUMMARY: The present systematic review and meta-analysis of PubMed/Medline, until December 2023 included 25 studies, involving 6835 IVF patients. Overall VD was defined as an approximation of community state type IV, including BV and AV-type dysbiosis based on either molecular or microscopy methods. Outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), early pregnancy loss (EPL), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR).Vaginal dysbiosis prevalence was 19% [1271/6835, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18-20%]. Six studies examined AV-type dysbiosis with a prevalence of 4% (26/628, 95% CI 3-6%). Vaginal dysbiosis correlates with a higher EPL [relative risk (RR) = 1.49, 95% CI 1.15-1.94] and lower CPR (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95). No statistically significant impact of VD, BV, or AV was found on LBR and BPR.Thus, the association between VD and reproductive outcome remains puzzling as it is difficult to explain how VD impacts CPR and EPL but not LBR and BPR.
KW - Abortion, Spontaneous/microbiology
KW - Dysbiosis/complications
KW - Female
KW - Fertilization in Vitro
KW - Humans
KW - Live Birth
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Pregnancy Outcome
KW - Pregnancy Rate
KW - Vagina/microbiology
KW - Vaginitis/microbiology
KW - Vaginosis, Bacterial/complications
KW - In vitro fertilization
KW - Aerobic vaginitis
KW - Reproductive outcomes
KW - Bacterial vaginosis
KW - Vaginal dysbiosis
U2 - 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000953
DO - 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000953
M3 - Review
C2 - 38597377
SN - 1040-872X
VL - 36
SP - 155
EP - 164
JO - Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology
JF - Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology
IS - 3
ER -