TY - JOUR
T1 - Utility of testing for monoclonal bands in serum of patients with suspected osteoporosis
T2 - Retrospective, cross sectional study
AU - Abrahamsen, Bo
AU - Andersen, Ivan
AU - Christensen, Susanne S.
AU - Madsen, Jonna Skov
AU - Brixen, Kim
PY - 2005/4/9
Y1 - 2005/4/9
N2 - Objective: To determine whether measuring monoclonal bands (M component) in serum should be part of the investigation of patients referred to osteoporosis clinics. Design: Retrospective, cross sectional, observational study. Setting: Referral centre for osteoporosis in a university hospital, Denmark. Participants: 799 people (685 women) aged 19 to 94 years newly referred with suspected osteoporosis. Main outcome measures: Proportion of patients fulfilling the Nordic Myeloma Study Group definition for target condition and proportion of patients with other important haematological conditions. Results: 4.9% (18 of 366) of patients with osteoporosis and 2.2% (9 of 408) of patients without osteoporosis had M components in serum (χ2 = 3.66, P = 0.04). Multiple myeloma was diagnosed in three patients with osteoporosis (absolute risk 0.8%, 95% confidence interval 0.11% to 1.7%). The relative risk of multiple myeloma in patients presenting with osteoporosis was 75 (10 to 160). As a diagnostic test for multiple myeloma in patients with osteoporosis, M component in serum had a specificity of 95.0% and a positive predictive value of 17.6%. 122 blood electrophoreses were carried out for each case of multiple myeloma diagnosed. All patients with multiple myeloma had a history of fragility fractures. If lymphoma was included as a target condition, the specificity increased to 95.3% and the positive predictive value increased to 23.5%. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance was diagnosed in 13 (3.6%) participants with osteoporosis and in eight (2.0%) participants with normal bone mineral density or osteopenia. Conclusions: Patients presenting with osteoporosis should be tested for M component in serum, as 1 in 20 patients with newly diagnosed osteoporosis had multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.
AB - Objective: To determine whether measuring monoclonal bands (M component) in serum should be part of the investigation of patients referred to osteoporosis clinics. Design: Retrospective, cross sectional, observational study. Setting: Referral centre for osteoporosis in a university hospital, Denmark. Participants: 799 people (685 women) aged 19 to 94 years newly referred with suspected osteoporosis. Main outcome measures: Proportion of patients fulfilling the Nordic Myeloma Study Group definition for target condition and proportion of patients with other important haematological conditions. Results: 4.9% (18 of 366) of patients with osteoporosis and 2.2% (9 of 408) of patients without osteoporosis had M components in serum (χ2 = 3.66, P = 0.04). Multiple myeloma was diagnosed in three patients with osteoporosis (absolute risk 0.8%, 95% confidence interval 0.11% to 1.7%). The relative risk of multiple myeloma in patients presenting with osteoporosis was 75 (10 to 160). As a diagnostic test for multiple myeloma in patients with osteoporosis, M component in serum had a specificity of 95.0% and a positive predictive value of 17.6%. 122 blood electrophoreses were carried out for each case of multiple myeloma diagnosed. All patients with multiple myeloma had a history of fragility fractures. If lymphoma was included as a target condition, the specificity increased to 95.3% and the positive predictive value increased to 23.5%. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance was diagnosed in 13 (3.6%) participants with osteoporosis and in eight (2.0%) participants with normal bone mineral density or osteopenia. Conclusions: Patients presenting with osteoporosis should be tested for M component in serum, as 1 in 20 patients with newly diagnosed osteoporosis had multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17244365821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmj.38376.401701.8F
DO - 10.1136/bmj.38376.401701.8F
M3 - Article
C2 - 15767267
AN - SCOPUS:17244365821
SN - 0959-8146
VL - 330
SP - 818
EP - 820
JO - British Medical Journal
JF - British Medical Journal
IS - 7495
ER -