TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a better understanding of caregiver distress in early psychosis: a systematic review of the psychological factors involved
T2 - Clinical Psychology Review
AU - Jansen, Jens Einar
AU - Gleeson, John
AU - Cotton, Sue
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - OBJECTIVES: We sought to review empirical studies of psychological factors accounting for distress in caregivers of young people with early psychosis. METHOD: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we included studies that empirically tested psychological models of caregiver distress in early psychosis by searching the following databases up until March 2014: PsycINFO, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). This was followed by additional manual searches of reference lists and relevant journals. RESULTS: The search identified 15 papers describing 13 studies together comprising 1056 caregivers of persons with early psychosis. The mean age of caregivers was 47.2years (SD=9.8), of whom 71.5% were female and 74.4% were parents. Nine different psychological variables were examined in the included studies, which were categorised in the following non-mutually exclusive groups: coping, appraisal/attribution and interpersonal response. There was considerable data to support the link between distress and psychological factors such as avoidant coping, appraisal and emotional over-involvement. However, the possibilities of drawing conclusions were limited by a number of methodological issues, including cross-sectional data, small sample sizes, confounding variables not being accounted for, and a wide variation in outcome measures. DISCUSSION: The strengths of the review were the systematic approach, the exclusion of non-empirical papers and the rating of methodological quality by two independent raters. Limitations were that we excluded studies published in languages other than English, that data extraction forms were developed for this study and hence not tested for validity, and that there was a potential publication bias in favour of significant findings. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: A better grasp of the psychological factors accounting for caregiver distress early in the course of illness may help us understand the trajectory of distress. This is an important step in preventing long-term distress in caregivers and supporting recovery in the whole family.
AB - OBJECTIVES: We sought to review empirical studies of psychological factors accounting for distress in caregivers of young people with early psychosis. METHOD: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we included studies that empirically tested psychological models of caregiver distress in early psychosis by searching the following databases up until March 2014: PsycINFO, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). This was followed by additional manual searches of reference lists and relevant journals. RESULTS: The search identified 15 papers describing 13 studies together comprising 1056 caregivers of persons with early psychosis. The mean age of caregivers was 47.2years (SD=9.8), of whom 71.5% were female and 74.4% were parents. Nine different psychological variables were examined in the included studies, which were categorised in the following non-mutually exclusive groups: coping, appraisal/attribution and interpersonal response. There was considerable data to support the link between distress and psychological factors such as avoidant coping, appraisal and emotional over-involvement. However, the possibilities of drawing conclusions were limited by a number of methodological issues, including cross-sectional data, small sample sizes, confounding variables not being accounted for, and a wide variation in outcome measures. DISCUSSION: The strengths of the review were the systematic approach, the exclusion of non-empirical papers and the rating of methodological quality by two independent raters. Limitations were that we excluded studies published in languages other than English, that data extraction forms were developed for this study and hence not tested for validity, and that there was a potential publication bias in favour of significant findings. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: A better grasp of the psychological factors accounting for caregiver distress early in the course of illness may help us understand the trajectory of distress. This is an important step in preventing long-term distress in caregivers and supporting recovery in the whole family.
KW - Attitude to Health
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Male
KW - Distress
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Caregivers
KW - Adaptation, Psychological
KW - Stress, Psychological
KW - family
KW - systematic review
KW - First-episode psychosis
KW - Carers
KW - psychotic disorders
KW - Burden
U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.12.002
M3 - Article
SN - 1873-7811
VL - 35
SP - 56
EP - 66
JO - Clinical Psychology Review
JF - Clinical Psychology Review
ER -