Total versus subtotal hysterectomy: An observational study with one-year follow-up

Helga Gimbel*, Vibeke Zobbe, Birthe M. Andersen, Christian Gluud, Bent S. Ottesen, Ann Tabor, Thomas Filtenborg, Kristian Jakobsen, Helle Christina Sørensen, Kim Toftager-Larsen, Katrine Sidenius, Nini Møller, Ellen Merete Madsen, Mogens Vejtorp, Helle Clausen, Annie Rosgaard, John Villumsen

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftArtikelForskningpeer review

    Abstrakt

    The aim of this study was to compare total and subtotal abdominal hysterectomy for benign indications, with regard to urinary incontinence, postoperative complications, quality of life (SF-36), constipation, prolapse, satisfaction with sexual life, and pelvic pain at 1-year postoperative. Eighty women chose total and 105 women chose subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. No significant differences were found between the 2 operation methods in any of the outcome measures at 12 months. Fourteen women (15%) from the subtotal abdominal hysterectomy group experienced vaginal bleeding and three women had their cervix removed.

    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Sider (fra-til)64-67
    Antal sider4
    TidsskriftAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
    Vol/bind45
    Udgave nummer1
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 1 feb. 2005

    Fingeraftryk

    Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'Total versus subtotal hysterectomy: An observational study with one-year follow-up' indeholder.

    Citationsformater