Spring til hovednavigation Spring til søgning Spring til hovedindhold

The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer

  • Sven Tyge Langkjer
  • , Julia Kenholm
  • , Jeanette Dupont Jensen
  • , Kim Wedervang
  • , Annette Torbøl Brixen
  • , Mie Grunnet
  • , Lars Stenbygaard
  • , Bjørnar Gilje
  • , Hella Danø
  • , Vesna Glavicic
  • , Erik Hugger Jacobsen
  • , Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen
  • , Helle Lemvig Kruse
  • , Trine Dongsgaard
  • , Jeppe Neimann
  • , Jürgen Geisler*
  • *Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftArtikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Sider (fra-til)2561-2569
Antal sider9
TidsskriftFuture Oncology
Vol/bind15
Udgave nummer22
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2019

Fingeraftryk

Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer' indeholder.

Citationsformater