The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Global Assessment of Psychosocial Disability (GAPD) in clinical practice--substance and reliability as judged by intraclass correlations

J Dyrborg, F W Larsen, S Nielsen, J Byman, B B Nielsen, F Gautrè-Delay

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftArtikelForskningpeer review

    Abstract

    Studies on the inter-rater reliability on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and the Global Assessment of Psychosocial Disability (GAPD) involving different subgroups of 145 outpatients from 4 to 16 years of age showed fair to substantial intraclass correlations of 0.59 to 0.90. Raters of different training levels participated. Interrater reliability was dependent on number of ratings per rater, training, available data sources and experience. A more detailed description of anchor points resulted in higher inter-rater agreement by psychiatrists training in child and adolescent psychiatry, but did not influence the inter-rater reliability among more (widely) experienced raters. Both the CGAS and the GAPD seem to be sufficiently reliable tools in clinical practice. The CGAS seems to be more sensitive to inter-rater variation than the GAPD.

    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Sider (fra-til)195-201
    Antal sider7
    TidsskriftEuropean Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    Vol/bind9
    Udgave nummer3
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - sep. 2000

    Fingeraftryk

    Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Global Assessment of Psychosocial Disability (GAPD) in clinical practice--substance and reliability as judged by intraclass correlations' indeholder.

    Citationsformater