TY - JOUR
T1 - Study protocol
T2 - E-freeze-freezing of embryos in assisted conception: A randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of a policy of freezing embryos followed by thawed frozen embryo transfer compared with a policy of fresh embryo transfer, in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation
AU - Maheshwari, Abha
AU - Bhattacharya, Siladitya
AU - Bowler, Ursula
AU - Brison, Daniel
AU - Child, Tim
AU - Cole, Christina
AU - Coomarasamy, Arri
AU - Cutting, Rachel
AU - Harbottle, Stephen
AU - Hardy, Pollyanna
AU - Juszczak, Edmund
AU - Khalaf, Yacoub
AU - Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
AU - Lavery, Stuart
AU - Lewis-Jones, Clare
AU - Macklon, Nick
AU - Raine-Fenning, Nick J.
AU - Rajkohwa, Madhurima
AU - Scotland, Graham
AU - Troup, Stephen
PY - 2019/6/13
Y1 - 2019/6/13
N2 - BACKGROUND: Infertility affects one in seven couples; many of these need in vitro fertilisation (IVF). IVF involves external hormones to stimulate a woman's ovaries to produce eggs which are harvested surgically. Embryos, created in the laboratory by mixing eggs with sperm, are grown in culture for a few days before being replaced within the uterus (fresh embryo transfer). Spare embryos are usually frozen with a view to transfer at a later point in time - especially if the initial fresh transfer does not result in a pregnancy. Despite improvements in technology, IVF success rates remain low with an overall live birth rate of 25-30% per treatment. Additionally, there are concerns about health outcomes for mothers and babies conceived through IVF, particularly after fresh embryo transfer, including maternal ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and preterm delivery. It is believed that high levels of hormones during ovarian stimulation could create a relatively hostile environment for embryo implantation whilst increasing the risk of OHSS. It has been suggested that freezing all embryos with the intention of thawing and replacing them within the uterus at a later stage (thawed frozen embryo transfer) instead of fresh embryo transfer, may lead to improved pregnancy rates and fewer complications. We aim to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of fresh and thawed frozen embryo transfer, with the primary aim of identifying any difference in the chance of having a healthy baby.METHODS: E-Freeze is a pragmatic, multicentre two-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial where women aged ≥18 and < 42 years, with at least three good quality embryos are randomly allocated to receive either a fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer. The primary outcome is a healthy baby, defined as a term, singleton, live birth with appropriate weight for gestation. Cost effectiveness will be calculated from a healthcare and societal perspective.DISCUSSION: E-Freeze will determine the relative benefits of fresh and thawed frozen embryo transfer in terms of improving the chance of having a healthy baby. The results of this pragmatic study have the potential to be directly transferred to clinical practice.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN61225414 . Date assigned 29/12/2015.
AB - BACKGROUND: Infertility affects one in seven couples; many of these need in vitro fertilisation (IVF). IVF involves external hormones to stimulate a woman's ovaries to produce eggs which are harvested surgically. Embryos, created in the laboratory by mixing eggs with sperm, are grown in culture for a few days before being replaced within the uterus (fresh embryo transfer). Spare embryos are usually frozen with a view to transfer at a later point in time - especially if the initial fresh transfer does not result in a pregnancy. Despite improvements in technology, IVF success rates remain low with an overall live birth rate of 25-30% per treatment. Additionally, there are concerns about health outcomes for mothers and babies conceived through IVF, particularly after fresh embryo transfer, including maternal ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and preterm delivery. It is believed that high levels of hormones during ovarian stimulation could create a relatively hostile environment for embryo implantation whilst increasing the risk of OHSS. It has been suggested that freezing all embryos with the intention of thawing and replacing them within the uterus at a later stage (thawed frozen embryo transfer) instead of fresh embryo transfer, may lead to improved pregnancy rates and fewer complications. We aim to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of fresh and thawed frozen embryo transfer, with the primary aim of identifying any difference in the chance of having a healthy baby.METHODS: E-Freeze is a pragmatic, multicentre two-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial where women aged ≥18 and < 42 years, with at least three good quality embryos are randomly allocated to receive either a fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer. The primary outcome is a healthy baby, defined as a term, singleton, live birth with appropriate weight for gestation. Cost effectiveness will be calculated from a healthcare and societal perspective.DISCUSSION: E-Freeze will determine the relative benefits of fresh and thawed frozen embryo transfer in terms of improving the chance of having a healthy baby. The results of this pragmatic study have the potential to be directly transferred to clinical practice.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN61225414 . Date assigned 29/12/2015.
KW - Assisted conception
KW - Elective freezing
KW - Fertility
KW - Fresh embryo transfer
KW - Frozen thawed embryo transfer
KW - IVF
KW - OHSS
KW - Receptivity
KW - Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/epidemiology
KW - Ovulation Induction
KW - Embryo, Mammalian
KW - Humans
KW - Infertility, Female/therapy
KW - Freezing
KW - Young Adult
KW - Fertilization in Vitro/legislation & jurisprudence
KW - Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Pregnancy Rate
KW - Embryo Transfer/methods
KW - Live Birth/epidemiology
KW - Embryo Implantation
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis
KW - Cryopreservation/economics
KW - Adolescent
KW - Pregnancy Outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067290086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12978-019-0737-2
DO - 10.1186/s12978-019-0737-2
M3 - Protocol
C2 - 31196113
AN - SCOPUS:85067290086
SN - 1742-4755
VL - 16
SP - 81
JO - Reproductive Health
JF - Reproductive Health
IS - 1
M1 - 81
ER -