TY - JOUR
T1 - 'Socioeconomic position and survival after cervical cancer
T2 - influence of cancer stage, comorbidity and smoking among Danish women diagnosed between 2005 and 2010
AU - Ibfelt, E. H.
AU - Kjær, S. K.
AU - Høgdall, C.
AU - Steding-Jessen, M.
AU - Kjær, T. K.
AU - Osler, M.
AU - Johansen, C.
AU - Frederiksen, K.
AU - Dalton, S. O.
PY - 2013/10/29
Y1 - 2013/10/29
N2 - Background:In an attempt to decrease social disparities in cancer survival, it is important to consider the mechanisms by which socioeconomic position influences cancer prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether any associations between socioeconomic factors and survival after cervical cancer could be explained by socioeconomic differences in cancer stage, comorbidity, lifestyle factors or treatment.Methods:We identified 1961 cases of cervical cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2010 in the Danish Gynaecological Cancer database, with information on prognostic factors, treatment and lifestyle. Age, vital status, comorbidity and socioeconomic data were obtained from nationwide administrative registers. Associations between socioeconomic indicators (education, income and cohabitation status) and mortality by all causes were analysed in Cox regression models with inclusion of possible mediators. Median follow-up time was 3.0 years (0.01-7.0).Results:All cause mortality was higher in women with shorter rather than longer education (hazard ratio (HR), 1.46; 1.20-1.77), among those with lower rather than higher income (HR, 1.32; 1.07-1.63) and among women aged<60 years without a partner rather than those who cohabited (HR, 1.60; 1.29-1.98). Socioeconomic differences in survival were partly explained by cancer stage and less by comorbidity or smoking (stage- and comorbidty- adjusted HRs being 1.07; 0.96-1.19 for education and 1.15; 0.86-1.52 for income).Conclusion:Socioeconomic disparities in survival after cervical cancer were partly explained by socioeconomic differences in cancer stage. The results point to the importance of further investigations into reducing diagnosis delay among disadvantaged groups.
AB - Background:In an attempt to decrease social disparities in cancer survival, it is important to consider the mechanisms by which socioeconomic position influences cancer prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether any associations between socioeconomic factors and survival after cervical cancer could be explained by socioeconomic differences in cancer stage, comorbidity, lifestyle factors or treatment.Methods:We identified 1961 cases of cervical cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2010 in the Danish Gynaecological Cancer database, with information on prognostic factors, treatment and lifestyle. Age, vital status, comorbidity and socioeconomic data were obtained from nationwide administrative registers. Associations between socioeconomic indicators (education, income and cohabitation status) and mortality by all causes were analysed in Cox regression models with inclusion of possible mediators. Median follow-up time was 3.0 years (0.01-7.0).Results:All cause mortality was higher in women with shorter rather than longer education (hazard ratio (HR), 1.46; 1.20-1.77), among those with lower rather than higher income (HR, 1.32; 1.07-1.63) and among women aged<60 years without a partner rather than those who cohabited (HR, 1.60; 1.29-1.98). Socioeconomic differences in survival were partly explained by cancer stage and less by comorbidity or smoking (stage- and comorbidty- adjusted HRs being 1.07; 0.96-1.19 for education and 1.15; 0.86-1.52 for income).Conclusion:Socioeconomic disparities in survival after cervical cancer were partly explained by socioeconomic differences in cancer stage. The results point to the importance of further investigations into reducing diagnosis delay among disadvantaged groups.
KW - comorbidity
KW - Denmark
KW - early detection of cancer
KW - smoking
KW - socioeconomic factors
KW - uterine cervical neoplasms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887015325&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/bjc.2013.558
DO - 10.1038/bjc.2013.558
M3 - Article
C2 - 24030072
AN - SCOPUS:84887015325
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 109
SP - 2489
EP - 2495
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 9
ER -