TY - JOUR
T1 - Routine brain MRI in suspected lung cancer
T2 - clinical justification and diagnostic yield
AU - Hviid, Camilla
AU - Laursen, Christian B
AU - Pietersen, Pia Iben
AU - Nielsen, Anne Lerberg
AU - Land, Lotte Holm
AU - Gouliaev, Anja
AU - Arshad, Arman
AU - Bodtger, Uffe
AU - Jull, Amanda Dandanell
N1 - Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Brain metastases are common and associated with poor prognosis. While MRI is highly sensitive for detecting brain metastases, the clinical value of routinely adding up-front MRI to PET/CT during initial staging remains debated. This study focuses on suspected lung cancer patients, integrating workflow data (MRI waiting time, MDT availability) to evaluate up-front brain MRI and its impact on clinical decision-making.METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 183 patients with suspected lung cancer referred for up-front brain MRI at Odense University Hospital between March-August 2021. All patients underwent pre-diagnostic PET/CT, and brain MRI was performed in cases with suspected stage II-IV disease (TNM 8th edition).RESULTS: Brain metastases were detected by MRI in 21/183 patients (11.5%), predominantly from primary lung cancer (n = 19, 90.4%). Among patients with confirmed lung cancer (n = 134), the prevalence was 14.2% (19/134), corresponding to a number needed to scan (NNS) of 7.1; across the full cohort, the NNS was 8.7. MRI led to upstaging to stage IV disease in 3/134 lung cancer patients (2.2%), resulting in a NNS of 44.7. PET/CT had a positive predictive value of 57.1% and a negative predictive value of 90.3%, indicating limited reliability detecting brain metastases.CONCLUSION: Routine up-front brain MRI identified brain metastases in a small but clinically relevant subset of patients, primarily those with signs of dissemination on initial PET/CT. A risk-stratified approach targeting high-risk groups may reduce MRI use without compromising detection, improving staging efficiency and resource allocation.
AB - BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Brain metastases are common and associated with poor prognosis. While MRI is highly sensitive for detecting brain metastases, the clinical value of routinely adding up-front MRI to PET/CT during initial staging remains debated. This study focuses on suspected lung cancer patients, integrating workflow data (MRI waiting time, MDT availability) to evaluate up-front brain MRI and its impact on clinical decision-making.METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 183 patients with suspected lung cancer referred for up-front brain MRI at Odense University Hospital between March-August 2021. All patients underwent pre-diagnostic PET/CT, and brain MRI was performed in cases with suspected stage II-IV disease (TNM 8th edition).RESULTS: Brain metastases were detected by MRI in 21/183 patients (11.5%), predominantly from primary lung cancer (n = 19, 90.4%). Among patients with confirmed lung cancer (n = 134), the prevalence was 14.2% (19/134), corresponding to a number needed to scan (NNS) of 7.1; across the full cohort, the NNS was 8.7. MRI led to upstaging to stage IV disease in 3/134 lung cancer patients (2.2%), resulting in a NNS of 44.7. PET/CT had a positive predictive value of 57.1% and a negative predictive value of 90.3%, indicating limited reliability detecting brain metastases.CONCLUSION: Routine up-front brain MRI identified brain metastases in a small but clinically relevant subset of patients, primarily those with signs of dissemination on initial PET/CT. A risk-stratified approach targeting high-risk groups may reduce MRI use without compromising detection, improving staging efficiency and resource allocation.
KW - Brain metastases
KW - Lung cancer
KW - Mri
KW - Non-small cell lung cancer
KW - Small cell lung cancer
KW - Staging
KW - Brain Neoplasms/secondary
KW - Lung Neoplasms/pathology
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Male
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
KW - Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
KW - Brain/diagnostic imaging
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Female
KW - Adult
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Aged
KW - Neoplasm Staging
U2 - 10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.101083
DO - 10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.101083
M3 - Article
C2 - 41496265
SN - 2213-0896
VL - 46
JO - Cancer Treatment and Research Communications
JF - Cancer Treatment and Research Communications
M1 - 101083
ER -