Rhinophyma treatment: An observational study comparing the results of the cold blade technique and ablative fractional CO2-laser

Sahar Vanessa Amiri*, Cecilie Mullerup Kiel, Berit Christina Carlsen, Elisabeth Hjardem Taudorf, Jørgen Hesselfeldt-Nielsen, Gregor B. E. Jemec, Jeanette Kaae

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftArtikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

Experts have widely discussed rhinophyma treatment, proposing and testing various therapies over the years. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the aesthetic outcomes of patients undergoing the cold blade technique at the Department of Plastic Surgery and ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO 2) laser treatment at the Department of Dermatology at Zealand University Hospital. We assessed rhinophyma severity using the RHISI scale with pre-and post-operative photographs evaluated by senior consultants from each department, who were blinded to the treatment method. Additionally, the patients completed a questionnaire to gauge their satisfaction and willingness to recommend the procedure. Cosmetic outcomes were deemed excellent or good (75% for surgery and 71% for CO 2-laser) in both treatment methods. Only one patient answered with moderate satisfaction. Therefore, we recommend both methods as possible treatment options.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Sider (fra-til)90-96
Antal sider7
TidsskriftJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Vol/bind101
Tidlig onlinedato29 nov. 2024
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2025

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Fingeraftryk

Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'Rhinophyma treatment: An observational study comparing the results of the cold blade technique and ablative fractional CO2-laser' indeholder.

Citationsformater