TY - JOUR
T1 - Rhinophyma treatment
T2 - An observational study comparing the results of the cold blade technique and ablative fractional CO2-laser
AU - Amiri, Sahar Vanessa
AU - Kiel, Cecilie Mullerup
AU - Carlsen, Berit Christina
AU - Taudorf, Elisabeth Hjardem
AU - Hesselfeldt-Nielsen, Jørgen
AU - Jemec, Gregor B. E.
AU - Kaae, Jeanette
N1 - Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Experts have widely discussed rhinophyma treatment, proposing and testing various therapies over the years. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the aesthetic outcomes of patients undergoing the cold blade technique at the Department of Plastic Surgery and ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO
2) laser treatment at the Department of Dermatology at Zealand University Hospital. We assessed rhinophyma severity using the RHISI scale with pre-and post-operative photographs evaluated by senior consultants from each department, who were blinded to the treatment method. Additionally, the patients completed a questionnaire to gauge their satisfaction and willingness to recommend the procedure. Cosmetic outcomes were deemed excellent or good (75% for surgery and 71% for CO
2-laser) in both treatment methods. Only one patient answered with moderate satisfaction. Therefore, we recommend both methods as possible treatment options.
AB - Experts have widely discussed rhinophyma treatment, proposing and testing various therapies over the years. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the aesthetic outcomes of patients undergoing the cold blade technique at the Department of Plastic Surgery and ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO
2) laser treatment at the Department of Dermatology at Zealand University Hospital. We assessed rhinophyma severity using the RHISI scale with pre-and post-operative photographs evaluated by senior consultants from each department, who were blinded to the treatment method. Additionally, the patients completed a questionnaire to gauge their satisfaction and willingness to recommend the procedure. Cosmetic outcomes were deemed excellent or good (75% for surgery and 71% for CO
2-laser) in both treatment methods. Only one patient answered with moderate satisfaction. Therefore, we recommend both methods as possible treatment options.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Esthetics
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Laser Therapy/methods
KW - Lasers, Gas/therapeutic use
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Patient Satisfaction
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Rhinophyma/surgery
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.053
DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.053
M3 - Article
C2 - 39709878
SN - 1748-6815
VL - 101
SP - 90
EP - 96
JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
ER -