Projekter pr. år
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Synthesise evidence for effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions following ACL and/or meniscal tear on symptomatic, functional, clinical, psychosocial, quality of life and reinjury outcomes.
DESIGN: Overview of systematic reviews with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty of evidence.
DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane Library.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials investigating rehabilitation interventions following ACL and/or meniscal tears in young adults.
RESULTS: We included 22 systematic reviews (142 trials of mostly men) evaluating ACL-injured individuals and none evaluating isolated meniscal injuries. We synthesised data from 16 reviews evaluating 12 different interventions. Moderate-certainty evidence was observed for: (1) neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve quadriceps strength; (2) open versus closed kinetic chain exercises to be similarly effective for quadriceps strength and self-reported function; (3) structured home-based versus structured in-person rehabilitation to be similarly effective for quadriceps and hamstring strength and self-reported function; and (4) postoperative knee bracing being ineffective for physical function and laxity. There was low-certainty evidence that: (1) preoperative exercise therapy improves self-reported and physical function postoperatively; (2) cryotherapy reduces pain and analgesic use; (3) psychological interventions improve anxiety/fear; and (4) whole body vibration improves quadriceps strength. There was very low-certainty evidence that: (1) protein-based supplements improve quadriceps size; (2) blood flow restriction training improves quadriceps size; (3) neuromuscular control exercises improve quadriceps and hamstring strength and self-reported function; and (4) continuous passive motion has no effect on range of motion.
CONCLUSION: The general level of evidence for rehabilitation after ACL or meniscal tear was low. Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that several rehabilitation types can improve quadriceps strength, while brace use has no effect on knee function/laxity.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Sider (fra-til) | 1445-1453 |
Antal sider | 9 |
Tidsskrift | British journal of sports medicine |
Vol/bind | 56 |
Udgave nummer | 24 |
Tidlig onlinedato | 29 jun. 2022 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - dec. 2022 |
Bibliografisk note
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Fingeraftryk
Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries: a best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews for the OPTIKNEE consensus' indeholder.Projekter
- 1 Afsluttet
-
OPTIKNEE Consensus
Whittaker, J. L. (Projektejer (lead)), Holm, P. M. (Projektdeltager), Culvenor, A. G. (Projektleder/Co-projektleder), Roos, E. M. (Projektleder/Co-projektleder), Crossley, K. M. (Projektleder/Co-projektleder) & Juhl, C. B. (Generel rådgivning)
1/05/19 → 31/12/22
Projekter: Projekt › Forskning