TY - JOUR
T1 - Progression from impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes in a high-risk screening programme in general practice
T2 - the ADDITION Study, Denmark.
AU - Rasmussen, S. S.
AU - Glümer, C.
AU - Sandbaek, A.
AU - Lauritzen, T.
AU - Borch-Johnsen, K.
PY - 2007/2
Y1 - 2007/2
N2 - AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To estimate the 1-year progression rates from both IFG and IGT to diabetes in individuals identified in a pragmatic diabetes screening programme in general practice (the ADDITION Study, Denmark [Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care]). METHODS: Persons aged 40-69 years were screened for type 2 diabetes based on a high-risk, stepwise strategy. At baseline, anthropometric measurements, blood samples and questionnaire data were collected. A total of 1,160 persons had IFG or IGT at baseline: 811 (70%) accepted re-examination after 1 year. Glucose tolerance classification was based on the 1999 WHO definition. At follow-up, diabetes was based on one diabetic glucose value of fasting blood glucose or 2-h blood glucose. RESULTS: At baseline, 308 persons had IFG and 503 had IGT. The incidence of diabetes was 17.6 and 18.8 per 100 person-years in the two groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: IFG and IGT identified in general practice during a stepwise, high-risk screening programme for type 2 diabetes have high 1-year progression rates to diabetes. Consequently, intensive follow-up and intervention strategies are recommended for these high-risk individuals.
AB - AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To estimate the 1-year progression rates from both IFG and IGT to diabetes in individuals identified in a pragmatic diabetes screening programme in general practice (the ADDITION Study, Denmark [Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care]). METHODS: Persons aged 40-69 years were screened for type 2 diabetes based on a high-risk, stepwise strategy. At baseline, anthropometric measurements, blood samples and questionnaire data were collected. A total of 1,160 persons had IFG or IGT at baseline: 811 (70%) accepted re-examination after 1 year. Glucose tolerance classification was based on the 1999 WHO definition. At follow-up, diabetes was based on one diabetic glucose value of fasting blood glucose or 2-h blood glucose. RESULTS: At baseline, 308 persons had IFG and 503 had IGT. The incidence of diabetes was 17.6 and 18.8 per 100 person-years in the two groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: IFG and IGT identified in general practice during a stepwise, high-risk screening programme for type 2 diabetes have high 1-year progression rates to diabetes. Consequently, intensive follow-up and intervention strategies are recommended for these high-risk individuals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249745527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00125-006-0530-y
DO - 10.1007/s00125-006-0530-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 17143605
AN - SCOPUS:34249745527
SN - 0012-186X
VL - 50
SP - 293
EP - 297
JO - Diabetologia
JF - Diabetologia
IS - 2
ER -