TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence of positive urinary dipstick analysis (leucocyte esterase, nitrite, haemoglobin, or glucose) in a population of 3645 adult subjects
T2 - Consequence for measurement of urinary albumin excretion rate
AU - Clausen, Peter
AU - Jensen, Jan S.
AU - Borch-Johnsen, Knut
AU - Jensen, Gorm
AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo
PY - 1998/12/1
Y1 - 1998/12/1
N2 - Objectives. To assess prevalence of positive urinary dipstick analysis for leucocyte esterase, nitrite, haemoglobin, or glucose in the general population and measure the urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) in subjects with or without a positive dipstick analysis. Design. A cross-sectional study of 3645 subjects. Setting. An unselected urban population study. Main outcome measures. Prevalence data of positive dipstick analyses and UAER values. Results. Prevalence data of a positive dipstick analysis were 12%, 4%, 3% and 6%, respectively, for leucocyte esterase, nitrite, haemoglobin, and glucose. Subjects with any positive dipstick analysis had significantly higher UAER than subjects with a negative analysis: 4.9 (4.4-5.3) (geometric mean (95% confidence interval)) vs 3.0 (2.9-3.1) mg 24 h-1 (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Prevalence data of positive urinary dipstick analyses in a large population based study are provided. Subjects with any positive finding had higher UAER than controls. Exclusion of subjects with a positive finding is recommended in studies of UAER as a cardiovascular risk factor in non-diabetic subjects.
AB - Objectives. To assess prevalence of positive urinary dipstick analysis for leucocyte esterase, nitrite, haemoglobin, or glucose in the general population and measure the urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) in subjects with or without a positive dipstick analysis. Design. A cross-sectional study of 3645 subjects. Setting. An unselected urban population study. Main outcome measures. Prevalence data of positive dipstick analyses and UAER values. Results. Prevalence data of a positive dipstick analysis were 12%, 4%, 3% and 6%, respectively, for leucocyte esterase, nitrite, haemoglobin, and glucose. Subjects with any positive dipstick analysis had significantly higher UAER than subjects with a negative analysis: 4.9 (4.4-5.3) (geometric mean (95% confidence interval)) vs 3.0 (2.9-3.1) mg 24 h-1 (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Prevalence data of positive urinary dipstick analyses in a large population based study are provided. Subjects with any positive finding had higher UAER than controls. Exclusion of subjects with a positive finding is recommended in studies of UAER as a cardiovascular risk factor in non-diabetic subjects.
KW - General population
KW - Urinary albumin excretion rate
KW - Urinary dipstick analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032420634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/003655998750015188
DO - 10.1080/003655998750015188
M3 - Article
C2 - 9925004
AN - SCOPUS:0032420634
VL - 32
SP - 399
EP - 404
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Urology
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Urology
SN - 2168-1805
IS - 6
ER -