Objective comparison of subtotal vs. total abdominal hysterectomy regarding pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial with 14-year follow-up

Lea L. Andersen*, Lars M. Alling Møller, Helga M. Gimbel

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftArtikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

Objective To compare subtotal and total abdominal hysterectomy regarding objective assessment of pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence and voiding function 14 years after hysterectomy for benign diseases. Study design Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of subtotal vs. total abdominal hysterectomy with objective outcomes. All randomized women still alive and living in Denmark (n = 304) were invited to answer a questionnaire and come for clinical examination consisting of 20-min pad weighing test, urinary flow, measurement of residual urine, POP-Q measurement for pelvic organ prolapse, 3 day voiding diary and also filled out the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire. Results We included 100/304 (32.9%) women (subtotal hysterectomy: 53, total hysterectomy: 47) in the clinical examinations. The study questionnaire was answered by 197 (64.8%) (subtotal: 97, total: 100), the PFDI-20 questionnaire was answered by 140 (46.1%) (subtotal: 68, total: 72). We found no difference between subtotal and total abdominal hysterectomy in the PFDI-20 scores or regarding objectively assessed urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. In the subtotal hysterectomy group, 31 (59.6%) women had objective stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse compared with 33 (70.2%) in the total hysterectomy group (P = 0.27); however, only 6/31 and 9/33 had symptoms (P = 0.45). There were more anterior pelvic organ prolapses in the total hysterectomy group (N = 10) than in the subtotal hysterectomy group (N = 4) (P = 0.048). We found a higher mean maximum flow rate (Qmax) in the subtotal hysterectomy group (34.78 ml/s) than in the total hysterectomy group (27.08 ml/s) (P = 0.042) as well as a higher mean functional capacity in the subtotal hysterectomy group (526 ml) than in the total hysterectomy group (443 ml) (P = 0.0147) according to the voiding diary. Conclusion Subtotal and total abdominal hysterectomy are comparable regarding long-term objective pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. The subtotal hysterectomy group had a higher Qmax and voided volume.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Sider (fra-til)40-45
Antal sider6
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Vol/bind193
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 okt. 2015

Fingeraftryk

Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'Objective comparison of subtotal vs. total abdominal hysterectomy regarding pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial with 14-year follow-up' indeholder.

Citationsformater