TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term outcome of FFR-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease in daily clinical practice
T2 - A propensity scorematched landmark analysis
AU - De Backer, Ole
AU - Biasco, Luigi
AU - Lønborg, Jacob
AU - Pedersen, Frants
AU - Holmvang, Lene
AU - Kelbaek, Henning
AU - Arnous, Samer
AU - Saunamäki, Kari
AU - Helqvist, Steffen
AU - Kastrup, Jens
AU - Jørgensen, Erik
AU - Engstrøm, Thomas
PY - 2016/2
Y1 - 2016/2
N2 - Aims: Our aim was to investigate the strength of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in daily practice. Methods and results: For this study, 3,512 patients with stable CAD and at least one 50-89% coronary stenosis were identified; those patients thought to require PCI (n=1,716) were selected. Of these, 962 (56%) were treated based on angiography (XA) alone, whereas 754 patients (44%) had an FFR-guided treatment. In the latter group, 321 patients (43%) were reallocated to another treatment, predominantly medical treatment. After propensity score matching, the number of indicated lesions was 957 in the XA-guided group and 947 in the FFR-guided group. FFR guidance resulted in PCI deferral in 462 lesions (48.8%). In a seven-day landmark analysis, the rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) was less than half in the FFR-guided group (p>0.05). For the eight-day to four-year follow-up period, FFR guidance resulted in a significantly lower rate of the combined endpoint of death/MI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63) and MI-driven target lesion revascularisation (HR 0.35). Conclusions: This large, retrospective study shows that performing FFR has a significant impact on therapeutic strategy and demonstrates the favourable long-term outcome of FFR-guided PCI in an "all-comers" population of patients with stable CAD in daily clinical practice.
AB - Aims: Our aim was to investigate the strength of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in daily practice. Methods and results: For this study, 3,512 patients with stable CAD and at least one 50-89% coronary stenosis were identified; those patients thought to require PCI (n=1,716) were selected. Of these, 962 (56%) were treated based on angiography (XA) alone, whereas 754 patients (44%) had an FFR-guided treatment. In the latter group, 321 patients (43%) were reallocated to another treatment, predominantly medical treatment. After propensity score matching, the number of indicated lesions was 957 in the XA-guided group and 947 in the FFR-guided group. FFR guidance resulted in PCI deferral in 462 lesions (48.8%). In a seven-day landmark analysis, the rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) was less than half in the FFR-guided group (p>0.05). For the eight-day to four-year follow-up period, FFR guidance resulted in a significantly lower rate of the combined endpoint of death/MI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63) and MI-driven target lesion revascularisation (HR 0.35). Conclusions: This large, retrospective study shows that performing FFR has a significant impact on therapeutic strategy and demonstrates the favourable long-term outcome of FFR-guided PCI in an "all-comers" population of patients with stable CAD in daily clinical practice.
KW - Fractional flow reserve
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Stable coronary artery disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962360850&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4244/EIJV11I11A247
DO - 10.4244/EIJV11I11A247
M3 - Article
C2 - 26865443
AN - SCOPUS:84962360850
SN - 1774-024X
VL - 11
SP - e1257-e1266
JO - EuroIntervention
JF - EuroIntervention
IS - 11
ER -