TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term follow-up of the TIPS early detection in psychosis study
T2 - Effects on 10-year outcome
AU - Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden
AU - Larsen, Tor K.
AU - Auestad, Bjørn
AU - Evensen, Julie
AU - Haahr, Ulrik
AU - Joa, Inge
AU - Johannesen, Jan O.
AU - Langeveld, Johannes
AU - Melle, Ingrid
AU - Opjordsmoen, Stein
AU - Rossberg, Jan Ivar
AU - Rund, Bjørn Rishovd
AU - Simonsen, Erik
AU - Sundet, Kjetil
AU - Vaglum, Per
AU - Friis, Svein
AU - McGlashan, Thomas
PY - 2012/4/1
Y1 - 2012/4/1
N2 - Objective: Early detection in first-episode psychosis confers advantages for negative, cognitive, and depressive symptoms after 1, 2, and 5 years, but longitudinal effects are unknown. The authors investigated the differences in symptoms and recovery after 10 years between regional health care sectors with and without a comprehensive program for the early detection of psychosis. Method: The authors evaluated 281 patients (early detection, N=141) 18 to 65 years old with a first episode of nonaffective psychosis between 1997 and 2001. Of these, 101 patients in the early-detection area and 73 patients in the usual-detection area were followed up at 10 years, and the authors compared their symptoms and recovery. Results: A significantly higher percentage of early-detection patients had recovered at the 10-year follow-up relative to usual-detection patients. This held true despite more severely ill patients dropping out of the study in the usual-detection area. Except for higher levels of excitative symptoms in the early-detection area, there were no symptom differences between the groups. Early-detection recovery rates were higher largely because of higher employment rates for patients in this group. Conclusions: Early detection of first-episode psychosis appears to increase the chances of milder deficits and superior functioning. The mechanisms by which this strategy improves the long-term prognosis of psychosis remain speculative. Nevertheless, our findings over 10 years may indicate that a prognostic link exists between the timing of intervention and outcome that deserves additional study.
AB - Objective: Early detection in first-episode psychosis confers advantages for negative, cognitive, and depressive symptoms after 1, 2, and 5 years, but longitudinal effects are unknown. The authors investigated the differences in symptoms and recovery after 10 years between regional health care sectors with and without a comprehensive program for the early detection of psychosis. Method: The authors evaluated 281 patients (early detection, N=141) 18 to 65 years old with a first episode of nonaffective psychosis between 1997 and 2001. Of these, 101 patients in the early-detection area and 73 patients in the usual-detection area were followed up at 10 years, and the authors compared their symptoms and recovery. Results: A significantly higher percentage of early-detection patients had recovered at the 10-year follow-up relative to usual-detection patients. This held true despite more severely ill patients dropping out of the study in the usual-detection area. Except for higher levels of excitative symptoms in the early-detection area, there were no symptom differences between the groups. Early-detection recovery rates were higher largely because of higher employment rates for patients in this group. Conclusions: Early detection of first-episode psychosis appears to increase the chances of milder deficits and superior functioning. The mechanisms by which this strategy improves the long-term prognosis of psychosis remain speculative. Nevertheless, our findings over 10 years may indicate that a prognostic link exists between the timing of intervention and outcome that deserves additional study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860311080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11030459
DO - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11030459
M3 - Article
C2 - 22407080
AN - SCOPUS:84860311080
SN - 0002-953X
VL - 169
SP - 374
EP - 380
JO - American Journal of Psychiatry
JF - American Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 4
ER -