TY - JOUR
T1 - Is prevention of Type-2 diabetes feasible and efficient in primary care?. A systematic PubMed review
AU - Lauritzen, Torsten
AU - Borch-Johnsen, Knut
AU - Sandbæk, Annelli
PY - 2007/2/1
Y1 - 2007/2/1
N2 - Aim: To answer: (1) Do we have effective treatments to improve prognosis for those identified at risk of Type-2 diabetes? (2) Will prevention be cost-effective? Methods: A systematic search was done in PubMed using the following search strategy: "diabetes AND prevention AND (IFG OR IGT)". Restrictions were: "English, Meta-Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial, Review, Humans". Results: Few randomised controlled preventive trials were found. Almost all were done in research settings in people with high risk of developing Type-2 diabetes. It seems possible to either delay or prevent Type-2 diabetes through lifestyle interventions and medication. Cost-utility analyses are few in number and come to very different conclusions as to whether health policy should promote prevention of Type-2 diabetes. Conclusion: Intervention studies using lifestyle counselling and drug therapy in research settings illustrate promising results with lowering of the incidence of Type-2 diabetes, meaning that Type-2 diabetes can be delayed or prevented. It is, however, questionable whether these interventions are cost-effective. We need studies in routine clinical settings evaluating morbidity, mortality and cost-effectiveness as primary outcomes. While waiting for these studies to prove cost-effective, patients with pre-diabetes should be treated according to their 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease following present guidelines.
AB - Aim: To answer: (1) Do we have effective treatments to improve prognosis for those identified at risk of Type-2 diabetes? (2) Will prevention be cost-effective? Methods: A systematic search was done in PubMed using the following search strategy: "diabetes AND prevention AND (IFG OR IGT)". Restrictions were: "English, Meta-Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial, Review, Humans". Results: Few randomised controlled preventive trials were found. Almost all were done in research settings in people with high risk of developing Type-2 diabetes. It seems possible to either delay or prevent Type-2 diabetes through lifestyle interventions and medication. Cost-utility analyses are few in number and come to very different conclusions as to whether health policy should promote prevention of Type-2 diabetes. Conclusion: Intervention studies using lifestyle counselling and drug therapy in research settings illustrate promising results with lowering of the incidence of Type-2 diabetes, meaning that Type-2 diabetes can be delayed or prevented. It is, however, questionable whether these interventions are cost-effective. We need studies in routine clinical settings evaluating morbidity, mortality and cost-effectiveness as primary outcomes. While waiting for these studies to prove cost-effective, patients with pre-diabetes should be treated according to their 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease following present guidelines.
KW - Cost-effectiveness
KW - IFG
KW - IGT
KW - Lifestyle intervention
KW - Pharmacological intervention
KW - Screening
KW - Type-2 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247217948&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pcd.2006.11.001
DO - 10.1016/j.pcd.2006.11.001
M3 - Review
C2 - 18632013
AN - SCOPUS:34247217948
SN - 1751-9918
VL - 1
SP - 5
EP - 11
JO - Primary Care Diabetes
JF - Primary Care Diabetes
IS - 1
ER -