TY - JOUR
T1 - Ibrutinib and rituximab versus immunochemotherapy in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (ENRICH)
T2 - a randomised, open-label, phase 2/3 superiority trial
AU - ENRICH investigators
AU - Lewis, David J
AU - Jerkeman, Mats
AU - Sorrell, Lexy
AU - Wright, David
AU - Glimelius, Ingrid
AU - Poulsen, Christian B
AU - Pasanen, Annika
AU - Rawstron, Andrew
AU - Wader, Karin F
AU - Morley, Nick
AU - Burton, Catherine
AU - Davies, Andrew J
AU - Lagerlöf, Ingemar
AU - Dalal, Surita
AU - De Tute, Ruth
AU - McNamara, Chris
AU - Crosbie, Nicola
AU - Toldbod, Helle Erbs
AU - Sanders, Jeanette
AU - Allgar, Victoria
AU - Aroori, Sree
AU - Warner, Mark
AU - Scully, Claire
AU - Wainman, Brian
AU - Christensen, Jacob Haaber
AU - Riise, Jon
AU - Sonnevi, Kristina
AU - Bishton, Mark J
AU - Eyre, Toby A
AU - Rule, Simon
N1 - Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/10/25
Y1 - 2025/10/25
N2 - BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, prolongs progression-free survival when added to immunochemotherapy as first line treatment. The ENRICH trial compared the chemotherapy-free combination of ibrutinib and the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (ibrutinib-rituximab) with standard immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP [rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone] or bendamustine-rituximab) in patients 60 years and older with untreated mantle-cell lymphoma.METHODS: This randomised, open-label, phase 2/3 superiority trial was performed at 66 sites in the UK, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. Patients 60 years and older with untreated mantle-cell lymphoma (Ann-Arbor stage II-IV disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score of 0-2) were randomly assigned to receive either rituximab plus immunochemotherapy or ibrutinib-rituximab in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by investigator choice of immunochemotherapy. Patients randomly allocated to the ibrutinib-rituximab (intervention) group received 560 mg oral ibrutinib daily in combination with six to eight cycles of 375 mg/m2 intravenous rituximab on day 1 of each cycle in the matched schedule of the pre-randomisation choice of immunochemotherapy (every 21 days for R-CHOP or every 28 days for rituximab-bendamustine). R-CHOP comprised 750 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, and 1·4 mg/m2 vincristine on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with 100 mg prednisolone on days 1-5 of each cycle. Rituximab-bendamustine comprised 90 mg/m2 of bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each cycle, in combination with 375 mg/m2 rituximab on day 1 of each cycle. All responding patients in both groups at the end of induction received maintenance rituximab administered every 8 weeks for 2 years, and patients allocated to the intervention group continued ibrutinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, stratified by immunochemotherapy choice and analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with EudraCT (2015-000832-13) and is closed for recruitment.FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2016, and June 30, 2021, 397 patients were randomly allocated to immunochemotherapy (control) or ibrutinib-rituximab (intervention). Of the 397, 107 (27%) were pre-allocated to the immunochemotherapy choice of R-CHOP and 290 (73%) were pre-allocated to rituximab-bendamustine. In total, 198 were allocated to the control group (53 to R-CHOP and 145 to bendamustine-rituximab) and 199 were allocated to intervention. The median age was 74 years (IQR 70-77) for the intervention group and 74 years (70-78) in the control group. 296 patients (75%) were male and 101 patients (25%) were female; ethnicity data were not collected. At a median follow-up of 47·9 months, the median progression-free survival of ibrutinib-rituximab was superior to immunochemotherapy, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·52-0·90); p=0·0034. For those with pre-randomisation choice R-CHOP, the HR was 0·37 (0·22-0·62), and with bendamustine-rituximab, the HR was 0·91 (0·66-1·25). Across induction and maintenance, 67% of patients assigned to ibrutinib-rituximab and 70% of patients receiving immunotherapy reported grade 3 or above adverse events.INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomised trial in untreated mantle-cell lymphoma to demonstrate significant improvement in progression-free survival for ibrutinib-rituximab compared to immunochemotherapy. This study suggests that ibrutinib-rituximab should be considered a new standard of care option for first-line treatment of older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma.FUNDING: Cancer Research UK (C7627/A17938) and Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceuticals.
AB - BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, prolongs progression-free survival when added to immunochemotherapy as first line treatment. The ENRICH trial compared the chemotherapy-free combination of ibrutinib and the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (ibrutinib-rituximab) with standard immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP [rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone] or bendamustine-rituximab) in patients 60 years and older with untreated mantle-cell lymphoma.METHODS: This randomised, open-label, phase 2/3 superiority trial was performed at 66 sites in the UK, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. Patients 60 years and older with untreated mantle-cell lymphoma (Ann-Arbor stage II-IV disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score of 0-2) were randomly assigned to receive either rituximab plus immunochemotherapy or ibrutinib-rituximab in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by investigator choice of immunochemotherapy. Patients randomly allocated to the ibrutinib-rituximab (intervention) group received 560 mg oral ibrutinib daily in combination with six to eight cycles of 375 mg/m2 intravenous rituximab on day 1 of each cycle in the matched schedule of the pre-randomisation choice of immunochemotherapy (every 21 days for R-CHOP or every 28 days for rituximab-bendamustine). R-CHOP comprised 750 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, and 1·4 mg/m2 vincristine on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with 100 mg prednisolone on days 1-5 of each cycle. Rituximab-bendamustine comprised 90 mg/m2 of bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each cycle, in combination with 375 mg/m2 rituximab on day 1 of each cycle. All responding patients in both groups at the end of induction received maintenance rituximab administered every 8 weeks for 2 years, and patients allocated to the intervention group continued ibrutinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, stratified by immunochemotherapy choice and analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with EudraCT (2015-000832-13) and is closed for recruitment.FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2016, and June 30, 2021, 397 patients were randomly allocated to immunochemotherapy (control) or ibrutinib-rituximab (intervention). Of the 397, 107 (27%) were pre-allocated to the immunochemotherapy choice of R-CHOP and 290 (73%) were pre-allocated to rituximab-bendamustine. In total, 198 were allocated to the control group (53 to R-CHOP and 145 to bendamustine-rituximab) and 199 were allocated to intervention. The median age was 74 years (IQR 70-77) for the intervention group and 74 years (70-78) in the control group. 296 patients (75%) were male and 101 patients (25%) were female; ethnicity data were not collected. At a median follow-up of 47·9 months, the median progression-free survival of ibrutinib-rituximab was superior to immunochemotherapy, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·52-0·90); p=0·0034. For those with pre-randomisation choice R-CHOP, the HR was 0·37 (0·22-0·62), and with bendamustine-rituximab, the HR was 0·91 (0·66-1·25). Across induction and maintenance, 67% of patients assigned to ibrutinib-rituximab and 70% of patients receiving immunotherapy reported grade 3 or above adverse events.INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomised trial in untreated mantle-cell lymphoma to demonstrate significant improvement in progression-free survival for ibrutinib-rituximab compared to immunochemotherapy. This study suggests that ibrutinib-rituximab should be considered a new standard of care option for first-line treatment of older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma.FUNDING: Cancer Research UK (C7627/A17938) and Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceuticals.
KW - Prednisone/therapeutic use
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Male
KW - Pyrazoles/administration & dosage
KW - Rituximab/administration & dosage
KW - Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/drug therapy
KW - Pyrimidines/administration & dosage
KW - Vincristine/administration & dosage
KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
KW - Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage
KW - Piperidines
KW - Progression-Free Survival
KW - Doxorubicin/administration & dosage
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Female
KW - Aged
KW - Adenine/analogs & derivatives
KW - Bendamustine Hydrochloride/administration & dosage
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01432-1
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01432-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 41052510
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 406
SP - 1953
EP - 1968
JO - Lancet (London, England)
JF - Lancet (London, England)
M1 - 10514
ER -