TY - JOUR
T1 - Grass pollen symptoms interfere with the recollection of birch pollen symptoms - A prospective study of suspected, asymptomatic skin sensitization
AU - Assing, K.
AU - Bodtger, U.
AU - Poulsen, L. K.
AU - Malling, H. J.
PY - 2007/4/1
Y1 - 2007/4/1
N2 - Background: Asymptomatic skin sensitization (AS) is a risk factor for the development of allergic symptoms. A meticulous definition of this condition requires a systematic assessment of clinical symptoms before inclusion. Objective: To examine the concordance between retrospective assessment of seasonal allergic symptoms and prospective seasonal symptom registration among subjects with AS. Methods: On the basis of a population survey, autumn 2002, including skin prick tests (positive if ≥3 mm) and a screening questionnaire, 87 subjects with AS to birch and/or grass pollen, birch and/or grass pollen allergic symptomatic subjects (n = 63) and healthy controls (n = 40) were included in January to March 2003, completed diary cards on symptom and medication use during the relevant seasons 2003, and were examined at follow up in autumn 2003. Allergy: positive SPT and symptoms ≥ seven diary days. Results: Eleven AS subjects (birch: n = 10) subsequently developed allergic symptoms, yet nine admitted, at follow up, to have had symptoms before inclusion, or even denied pollen-related symptoms despite a significant diary. Compared with AS subjects sensitized to grass pollen, AS subjects sensitized to birch pollen had significantly larger skin prick reactions and more often and severe pollen symptoms. Conclusion: In the context of double-sensitization, retrospective symptom assessment is not a reliable method for ensuring that subjects classified, as asymptomatically skin sensitized, are truly, asymptomatic. This matter should be considered in studies on allergy development.
AB - Background: Asymptomatic skin sensitization (AS) is a risk factor for the development of allergic symptoms. A meticulous definition of this condition requires a systematic assessment of clinical symptoms before inclusion. Objective: To examine the concordance between retrospective assessment of seasonal allergic symptoms and prospective seasonal symptom registration among subjects with AS. Methods: On the basis of a population survey, autumn 2002, including skin prick tests (positive if ≥3 mm) and a screening questionnaire, 87 subjects with AS to birch and/or grass pollen, birch and/or grass pollen allergic symptomatic subjects (n = 63) and healthy controls (n = 40) were included in January to March 2003, completed diary cards on symptom and medication use during the relevant seasons 2003, and were examined at follow up in autumn 2003. Allergy: positive SPT and symptoms ≥ seven diary days. Results: Eleven AS subjects (birch: n = 10) subsequently developed allergic symptoms, yet nine admitted, at follow up, to have had symptoms before inclusion, or even denied pollen-related symptoms despite a significant diary. Compared with AS subjects sensitized to grass pollen, AS subjects sensitized to birch pollen had significantly larger skin prick reactions and more often and severe pollen symptoms. Conclusion: In the context of double-sensitization, retrospective symptom assessment is not a reliable method for ensuring that subjects classified, as asymptomatically skin sensitized, are truly, asymptomatic. This matter should be considered in studies on allergy development.
KW - Allergy
KW - Asymptomatic skin sensitization
KW - Birch pollen
KW - Conversion rate
KW - Grass pollen
KW - Recollection
KW - Retrospective
KW - Symptom diary
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947158745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01280.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01280.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 17362247
AN - SCOPUS:33947158745
VL - 62
SP - 373
EP - 377
JO - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
SN - 0105-4538
IS - 4
ER -