Expert consensus on a train-the-trainer curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery

M Gómez Ruiz; S Alfieri; T Becker; M Bergmann; U Boggi; J Collins; N Figueiredo; I Gögenur; K Matzel; D Miskovic; A Parvaiz; J Pratschke; J Rivera Castellano; T Qureshi; L B Svendsen; P Tekkis; C Vaz

doi:10.1111/codi.14637

Expert consensus on a train-the-trainer curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery

M Gómez Ruiz^*, S Alfieri, T Becker, M Bergmann, U Boggi, J Collins, N Figueiredo, I Gögenur, K Matzel, D Miskovic, A Parvaiz, J Pratschke, J Rivera Castellano, T Qureshi, L B Svendsen, P Tekkis, C Vaz

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Artikel › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

AIM: Robotic techniques are being increasingly used in colorectal surgery. There is, however, a lack of training opportunities and structured training programmes. Robotic surgery has specific problems and challenges for trainers and trainees. Ergonomics, specific skills and user-machine interfaces are different from those in traditional laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to establish expert consensus on the requirements for a robotic train-the-trainer curriculum amongst robotic surgeons and trainers.

METHOD: This is a modified Delphi-type study involving 14 experts in robotic surgery teaching. A reiterating 19-item questionnaire was sent out to the same group and agreement levels analysed. A consensus of 0.8 or higher was considered to be high-level agreement.

RESULTS: Response rates were 93-100% and most items reached high levels of agreement within three rounds. Specific requirements for a robotic faculty development curriculum included maximizing dual-console teaching, theatre team training, nontechnical skills training, patient safety, user-machine interface training and telementoring.

CONCLUSION: A clear need for the development of a train-the-trainer curriculum has been identified. Further research is needed to assess feasibility, effectiveness and clinical impact of a robotic train-the-trainer curriculum.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Sider (fra-til)	903-908
Antal sider	6
Tidsskrift	Colorectal Disease
Vol/bind	21
Udgave nummer	8
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14637
Status	Udgivet - aug. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Colorectal Disease � 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1111/codi.14637

Citationsformater

Gómez Ruiz, M., Alfieri, S., Becker, T., Bergmann, M., Boggi, U., Collins, J., Figueiredo, N., Gögenur, I., Matzel, K., Miskovic, D., Parvaiz, A., Pratschke, J., Rivera Castellano, J., Qureshi, T., Svendsen, L. B., Tekkis, P., & Vaz, C. (2019). Expert consensus on a train-the-trainer curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Disease, 21(8), 903-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14637

@article{28a1e80a779e49d78b444ff37f98b23a,

title = "Expert consensus on a train-the-trainer curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery",

abstract = "AIM: Robotic techniques are being increasingly used in colorectal surgery. There is, however, a lack of training opportunities and structured training programmes. Robotic surgery has specific problems and challenges for trainers and trainees. Ergonomics, specific skills and user-machine interfaces are different from those in traditional laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to establish expert consensus on the requirements for a robotic train-the-trainer curriculum amongst robotic surgeons and trainers.METHOD: This is a modified Delphi-type study involving 14 experts in robotic surgery teaching. A reiterating 19-item questionnaire was sent out to the same group and agreement levels analysed. A consensus of 0.8 or higher was considered to be high-level agreement.RESULTS: Response rates were 93-100% and most items reached high levels of agreement within three rounds. Specific requirements for a robotic faculty development curriculum included maximizing dual-console teaching, theatre team training, nontechnical skills training, patient safety, user-machine interface training and telementoring.CONCLUSION: A clear need for the development of a train-the-trainer curriculum has been identified. Further research is needed to assess feasibility, effectiveness and clinical impact of a robotic train-the-trainer curriculum.",

author = "{G{\'o}mez Ruiz}, M and S Alfieri and T Becker and M Bergmann and U Boggi and J Collins and N Figueiredo and I G{\"o}genur and K Matzel and D Miskovic and A Parvaiz and J Pratschke and {Rivera Castellano}, J and T Qureshi and Svendsen, {L B} and P Tekkis and C Vaz",

note = "Colorectal Disease � 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.",

year = "2019",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1111/codi.14637",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "903--908",

journal = "Colorectal Disease",

issn = "1462-8910",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "8",

}

Gómez Ruiz, M, Alfieri, S, Becker, T, Bergmann, M, Boggi, U, Collins, J, Figueiredo, N, Gögenur, I, Matzel, K, Miskovic, D, Parvaiz, A, Pratschke, J, Rivera Castellano, J, Qureshi, T, Svendsen, LB, Tekkis, P & Vaz, C 2019, 'Expert consensus on a train-the-trainer curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery', Colorectal Disease, bind 21, nr. 8, s. 903-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14637

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expert consensus on a train-the-trainer curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery

AU - Gómez Ruiz, M

AU - Alfieri, S

AU - Becker, T

AU - Bergmann, M

AU - Boggi, U

AU - Collins, J

AU - Figueiredo, N

AU - Gögenur, I

AU - Matzel, K

AU - Miskovic, D

AU - Parvaiz, A

AU - Pratschke, J

AU - Rivera Castellano, J

AU - Qureshi, T

AU - Svendsen, L B

AU - Tekkis, P

AU - Vaz, C

N1 - Colorectal Disease � 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - AIM: Robotic techniques are being increasingly used in colorectal surgery. There is, however, a lack of training opportunities and structured training programmes. Robotic surgery has specific problems and challenges for trainers and trainees. Ergonomics, specific skills and user-machine interfaces are different from those in traditional laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to establish expert consensus on the requirements for a robotic train-the-trainer curriculum amongst robotic surgeons and trainers.METHOD: This is a modified Delphi-type study involving 14 experts in robotic surgery teaching. A reiterating 19-item questionnaire was sent out to the same group and agreement levels analysed. A consensus of 0.8 or higher was considered to be high-level agreement.RESULTS: Response rates were 93-100% and most items reached high levels of agreement within three rounds. Specific requirements for a robotic faculty development curriculum included maximizing dual-console teaching, theatre team training, nontechnical skills training, patient safety, user-machine interface training and telementoring.CONCLUSION: A clear need for the development of a train-the-trainer curriculum has been identified. Further research is needed to assess feasibility, effectiveness and clinical impact of a robotic train-the-trainer curriculum.

AB - AIM: Robotic techniques are being increasingly used in colorectal surgery. There is, however, a lack of training opportunities and structured training programmes. Robotic surgery has specific problems and challenges for trainers and trainees. Ergonomics, specific skills and user-machine interfaces are different from those in traditional laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to establish expert consensus on the requirements for a robotic train-the-trainer curriculum amongst robotic surgeons and trainers.METHOD: This is a modified Delphi-type study involving 14 experts in robotic surgery teaching. A reiterating 19-item questionnaire was sent out to the same group and agreement levels analysed. A consensus of 0.8 or higher was considered to be high-level agreement.RESULTS: Response rates were 93-100% and most items reached high levels of agreement within three rounds. Specific requirements for a robotic faculty development curriculum included maximizing dual-console teaching, theatre team training, nontechnical skills training, patient safety, user-machine interface training and telementoring.CONCLUSION: A clear need for the development of a train-the-trainer curriculum has been identified. Further research is needed to assess feasibility, effectiveness and clinical impact of a robotic train-the-trainer curriculum.

U2 - 10.1111/codi.14637

DO - 10.1111/codi.14637

M3 - Article

C2 - 30963654

SN - 1462-8910

VL - 21

SP - 903

EP - 908

JO - Colorectal Disease

JF - Colorectal Disease

IS - 8

ER -

Expert consensus on a train-the-trainer curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery

Abstract

Bibliografisk note

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater