TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating the effect size of the 15Q11.2 BP1-BP2 deletion and its contribution to neurodevelopmental symptoms
T2 - recommendations for practice
AU - 15q11.2 Working Group
AU - Jønch, Aia Elise
AU - Douard, Elise
AU - Moreau, Clara
AU - Van Dijck, Anke
AU - Passeggeri, Marzia
AU - Kooy, Frank
AU - Puechberty, Jacques
AU - Campbell, Carolyn
AU - Sanlaville, Damien
AU - Lefroy, Henrietta
AU - Richetin, Sonia
AU - Pain, Aurelie
AU - Geneviève, David
AU - Kini, Usha
AU - Le Caignec, Cédric
AU - Lespinasse, James
AU - Skytte, Anne-Bine
AU - Isidor, Bertrand
AU - Zweier, Christiane
AU - Caberg, Jean-Hubert
AU - Delrue, Marie-Ange
AU - Møller, Rikke Steensbjerre
AU - Bojesen, Anders
AU - Hjalgrim, Helle
AU - Brasch-Andersen, Charlotte
AU - Lemyre, Emmanuelle
AU - Ousager, Lilian Bomme
AU - Jacquemont, Sébastien
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - BACKGROUND: The 15q11.2 deletion is frequently identified in the neurodevelopmental clinic. Case-control studies have associated the 15q11.2 deletion with neurodevelopmental disorders, and clinical case series have attempted to delineate a microdeletion syndrome with considerable phenotypic variability. The literature on this deletion is extensive and confusing, which is a challenge for genetic counselling. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect size of the 15q11.2 deletion and quantify its contribution to neurodevelopmental disorders.METHODS: We performed meta-analyses on new and previously published case-control studies and used statistical models trained in unselected populations with cognitive assessments. We used new (n=241) and previously published (n=150) data from a clinically referred group of deletion carriers. 15q11.2 duplications (new n=179 and previously published n=35) were used as a neutral control variant.RESULTS: The deletion decreases IQ by 4.3 points. The estimated ORs and respective frequencies in deletion carriers for intellectual disabilities, schizophrenia and epilepsy are 1.7 (3.4%), 1.5 (2%) and 3.1 (2.1%), respectively. There is no increased risk for heart malformations and autism. In the clinically referred group, the frequency and nature of symptoms in deletions are not different from those observed in carriers of the 15q11.2 duplication suggesting that most of the reported symptoms are due to ascertainment bias.CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that the deletion should be classified as 'pathogenic of mild effect size'. Since it explains only a small proportion of the phenotypic variance in carriers, it is not worth discussing in the developmental clinic or in a prenatal setting.
AB - BACKGROUND: The 15q11.2 deletion is frequently identified in the neurodevelopmental clinic. Case-control studies have associated the 15q11.2 deletion with neurodevelopmental disorders, and clinical case series have attempted to delineate a microdeletion syndrome with considerable phenotypic variability. The literature on this deletion is extensive and confusing, which is a challenge for genetic counselling. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect size of the 15q11.2 deletion and quantify its contribution to neurodevelopmental disorders.METHODS: We performed meta-analyses on new and previously published case-control studies and used statistical models trained in unselected populations with cognitive assessments. We used new (n=241) and previously published (n=150) data from a clinically referred group of deletion carriers. 15q11.2 duplications (new n=179 and previously published n=35) were used as a neutral control variant.RESULTS: The deletion decreases IQ by 4.3 points. The estimated ORs and respective frequencies in deletion carriers for intellectual disabilities, schizophrenia and epilepsy are 1.7 (3.4%), 1.5 (2%) and 3.1 (2.1%), respectively. There is no increased risk for heart malformations and autism. In the clinically referred group, the frequency and nature of symptoms in deletions are not different from those observed in carriers of the 15q11.2 duplication suggesting that most of the reported symptoms are due to ascertainment bias.CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that the deletion should be classified as 'pathogenic of mild effect size'. Since it explains only a small proportion of the phenotypic variance in carriers, it is not worth discussing in the developmental clinic or in a prenatal setting.
U2 - 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105879
DO - 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105879
M3 - Article
C2 - 31451536
SN - 0022-2593
VL - 56
SP - 701
EP - 710
JO - Journal of Medical Genetics
JF - Journal of Medical Genetics
IS - 10
ER -