Abstract
Although considerable progress has been made over the past 2 decades in the field of eating-disorder epidemiology, there is room for improvement. Eating disorder diagnoses for children, need assessment, prospective longitudinal studies, studies of natural cause, treatment dose-effect studies, and bias are all areas that need careful consideration. Clinicians should consider establishing a Cochrane database for eating disorders. The mortality studies reviewed in this article are dominated by small, sparse, unbalanced data sets, and publication bias and bias caused by loss to follow-up limits the validity of the reported findings. Some methodologic advice is given in the hope that some of the more obvious pitfalls can be avoided in future research.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Sider (fra-til) | 201-14, vii-viii |
| Tidsskrift | Psychiatric Clinics of North America |
| Vol/bind | 24 |
| Udgave nummer | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - jun. 2001 |