TY - JOUR
T1 - Eligibility for renal denervation
T2 - Experience at 11 European expert centers
AU - Persu, Alexandre
AU - Jin, Yu
AU - Baelen, Marie
AU - Vink, Eva
AU - Verloop, Willemien L.
AU - Schmidt, Bernhard
AU - Blicher, Marie K.
AU - Severino, Francesca
AU - Wuerzner, Grégoire
AU - Taylor, Alison
AU - Pechère-Bertschi, Antoinette
AU - Jokhaji, Fadi
AU - Elmula, Fadl Elmula M.Fadl
AU - Rosa, Jan
AU - Czarnecka, Danuta
AU - Ehret, Georg
AU - Kahan, Thomas
AU - Renkin, Jean
AU - Widimský, Jiří
AU - Jacobs, Lotte
AU - Spiering, Wilko
AU - Burnier, Michel
AU - Mark, Patrick B.
AU - Menne, Jan
AU - Olsen, Michael H.
AU - Blankestijn, Peter J.
AU - Kjeldsen, Sverre
AU - Bots, Michiel L.
AU - Staessen, Jan A.
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - Based on the SYMPLICITY studies and CE (Conformité Européenne) certification, renal denervation is currently applied as a novel treatment of resistant hypertension in Europe. However, information on the proportion of patients with resistant hypertension qualifying for renal denervation after a thorough work-up and treatment adjustment remains scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of patients eligible for renal denervation and the reasons for noneligibility at 11 expert centers participating in the European Network COordinating Research on renal Denervation in treatment-resistant hypertension (ENCOReD). The analysis included 731 patients. Age averaged 61.6 years, office blood pressure at screening was 177/96 mm Hg, and the number of blood pressure-lowering drugs taken was 4.1. Specialists referred 75.6% of patients. The proportion of patients eligible for renal denervation according to the SYMPLICITY HTN- 2 criteria and each center's criteria was 42.5% (95% confidence interval, 38.0%-47.0%) and 39.7% (36.2%-43.2%), respectively. The main reasons of noneligibility were normalization of blood pressure after treatment adjustment (46.9%), unsuitable renal arterial anatomy (17.0%), and previously undetected secondary causes of hypertension (11.1%). In conclusion, after careful screening and treatment adjustment at hypertension expert centers, only ≈40% of patients referred for renal denervation, mostly by specialists, were eligible for the procedure. The most frequent cause of ineligibility (approximately half of cases) was blood pressure normalization after treatment adjustment by a hypertension specialist. Our findings highlight that hypertension centers with a record in clinical experience and research should remain the gatekeepers before renal denervation is considered.
AB - Based on the SYMPLICITY studies and CE (Conformité Européenne) certification, renal denervation is currently applied as a novel treatment of resistant hypertension in Europe. However, information on the proportion of patients with resistant hypertension qualifying for renal denervation after a thorough work-up and treatment adjustment remains scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of patients eligible for renal denervation and the reasons for noneligibility at 11 expert centers participating in the European Network COordinating Research on renal Denervation in treatment-resistant hypertension (ENCOReD). The analysis included 731 patients. Age averaged 61.6 years, office blood pressure at screening was 177/96 mm Hg, and the number of blood pressure-lowering drugs taken was 4.1. Specialists referred 75.6% of patients. The proportion of patients eligible for renal denervation according to the SYMPLICITY HTN- 2 criteria and each center's criteria was 42.5% (95% confidence interval, 38.0%-47.0%) and 39.7% (36.2%-43.2%), respectively. The main reasons of noneligibility were normalization of blood pressure after treatment adjustment (46.9%), unsuitable renal arterial anatomy (17.0%), and previously undetected secondary causes of hypertension (11.1%). In conclusion, after careful screening and treatment adjustment at hypertension expert centers, only ≈40% of patients referred for renal denervation, mostly by specialists, were eligible for the procedure. The most frequent cause of ineligibility (approximately half of cases) was blood pressure normalization after treatment adjustment by a hypertension specialist. Our findings highlight that hypertension centers with a record in clinical experience and research should remain the gatekeepers before renal denervation is considered.
KW - Antihypertensive Agents
KW - Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy
KW - Sympathetic Denervation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902246226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03194
DO - 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03194
M3 - Article
C2 - 24664290
AN - SCOPUS:84902246226
SN - 0194-911X
VL - 63
SP - 1319
EP - 1325
JO - Hypertension
JF - Hypertension
IS - 6
ER -