TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Omeprazole and Cimetidine on Duodenal Ulcer
T2 - A Double-Blind Comparative Trial
AU - Lauritsen, Karsten
AU - Rune, Simon J.
AU - Bytzer, Peter
AU - Kelbaek, Henning
AU - Jensen, Kaj Gotlieb
AU - Rask-Madsen, Jørgen
AU - Bendtsen, Flemming
AU - Linde, Jøorgen
AU - Højlund, Magnus
AU - Andersen, Hans Harrestrup
AU - Møllmann, Knud Mogens
AU - Nissen, Verner R.
AU - Ovesen, Lars
AU - Schlichting, Poul
AU - Tage-Jensen, Ulrik
AU - Wulff, Henrik R.
PY - 1985/4/11
Y1 - 1985/4/11
N2 - We conducted a double-blind randomized study of 132 patients to determine whether the new, investigational proton-pump inhibitor, omeprazole (30 mg per day), would accelerate healing and pain relief, as compared with cimetidine (1 g per day), in patients with duodenal ulcer. After two weeks of treatment, which was completed by all patients, the healing rates were 73 per cent in the omeprazole group and 46 per cent in the cimetidine group (P<0.01). After four weeks of treatment, which was completed by 118 patients, the corresponding figures were 92 and 74 per cent (P<0.05). In the omeprazole group 55 per cent of the patients were free of pain after the first week, as compared with 40 per cent of those treated with cimetidine (P>0.05). No major clinical or biochemical side effects of omeprazole or cimetidine were noted. A six-month follow-up study revealed no significant difference between the recurrence rates after omeprazole and after cimetidine treatment. In May 1984 clinical trials with omeprazole were temporarily suspended, since a study of long-term toxicity in rats had shown the development of gastric carcinoid tumors. (N Engl J Med 1985; 312:958–61.).
AB - We conducted a double-blind randomized study of 132 patients to determine whether the new, investigational proton-pump inhibitor, omeprazole (30 mg per day), would accelerate healing and pain relief, as compared with cimetidine (1 g per day), in patients with duodenal ulcer. After two weeks of treatment, which was completed by all patients, the healing rates were 73 per cent in the omeprazole group and 46 per cent in the cimetidine group (P<0.01). After four weeks of treatment, which was completed by 118 patients, the corresponding figures were 92 and 74 per cent (P<0.05). In the omeprazole group 55 per cent of the patients were free of pain after the first week, as compared with 40 per cent of those treated with cimetidine (P>0.05). No major clinical or biochemical side effects of omeprazole or cimetidine were noted. A six-month follow-up study revealed no significant difference between the recurrence rates after omeprazole and after cimetidine treatment. In May 1984 clinical trials with omeprazole were temporarily suspended, since a study of long-term toxicity in rats had shown the development of gastric carcinoid tumors. (N Engl J Med 1985; 312:958–61.).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021969558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJM198504113121505
DO - 10.1056/NEJM198504113121505
M3 - Article
C2 - 3883182
AN - SCOPUS:0021969558
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 312
SP - 958
EP - 961
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 15
ER -