TY - JOUR
T1 - Do ultrasound-guided regional blocks signify a new paradigm in high-risk patients?
AU - Bendtsen, Thomas F.
AU - Haskins, Stephen
AU - Kølsen Petersen, Jens Aage
AU - Børglum, Jens
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - It has been suggested for many years that regional anaesthesia is advantageous in high-risk patients, either as the sole anaesthetic or in combination with general anaesthesia. Regional techniques are safe and even more so when guided by ultrasound. In the high-risk patient population, ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (UGRA) can help decrease risk of perioperative morbidity and improve short-term as well as long-term outcomes, particularly in the orthopaedic, vascular, oncologic and chronic pain patient populations. Nevertheless, complications do still occur and benefits of a specific regional nerve blockade need to be weighed against potential risks on an individual basis. The emergence of reasonably priced, easy-to-use ultrasound machines facilitates regional anaesthesia, and this kind of anaesthesia may become the standard of care in high-risk patients.
AB - It has been suggested for many years that regional anaesthesia is advantageous in high-risk patients, either as the sole anaesthetic or in combination with general anaesthesia. Regional techniques are safe and even more so when guided by ultrasound. In the high-risk patient population, ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (UGRA) can help decrease risk of perioperative morbidity and improve short-term as well as long-term outcomes, particularly in the orthopaedic, vascular, oncologic and chronic pain patient populations. Nevertheless, complications do still occur and benefits of a specific regional nerve blockade need to be weighed against potential risks on an individual basis. The emergence of reasonably priced, easy-to-use ultrasound machines facilitates regional anaesthesia, and this kind of anaesthesia may become the standard of care in high-risk patients.
KW - high-risk patients
KW - regional anaesthesia
KW - ultrasound
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84976489330
U2 - 10.1016/j.bpa.2016.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.bpa.2016.04.004
M3 - Review
C2 - 27396806
AN - SCOPUS:84976489330
SN - 1521-6896
VL - 30
SP - 191
EP - 200
JO - Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology
JF - Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology
IS - 2
ER -