Current clinical magnetoencephalography practice across Europe: Are we closer to use MEG as an established clinical tool?

Xavier De Tiège*, Daniel Lundqvist, Sándor Beniczky, Stefano Seri, Ritva Paetau

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftArtikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

PURPOSE: This comprehensive survey aims at characterizing the current clinical use of magnetoencephalography (MEG) across European MEG centres.

METHODS: Forty-four MEG centres across Europe were contacted in May 2015 via personalized e-mail to contribute to survey. The web-based survey was available on-line for 1 month and the MEG centres that did not respond were further contacted to maximize participation.

RESULTS: Among the 57% of responders, 12 centres from 10 different countries reported to use MEG for clinical applications. A total of 524 MEG investigations were performed in 2014 for the pre-surgical evaluation of epilepsy, while in the same period 244 MEG investigations were performed for pre-surgical functional brain mapping. Seven MEG centres located in different European countries performed ≥50 MEG investigations for epilepsy mapping in 2014, both in children and adults. In those centres, time from patient preparation to MEG data reporting tends to be lower than those investigating a lower annual number of patients.

CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates that there is in Europe an increasing and widespread expertise in the field of clinical MEG. These findings should serve as a basis to harmonize clinical MEG procedures and promote the clinical added value of MEG across Europe. MEG should now be considered in Europe as a mature clinical neurophysiological technique that should be used routinely in two specific clinical indications, i.e, the pre-surgical evaluation of refractory focal epilepsy and functional brain mapping.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Sider (fra-til)53-59
Antal sider7
TidsskriftSeizure
Vol/bind50
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2017

Fingeraftryk

Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'Current clinical magnetoencephalography practice across Europe: Are we closer to use MEG as an established clinical tool?' indeholder.

Citationsformater