TY - JOUR
T1 - Concerns on future fertility among users and past-users of combined oral contraceptives
T2 - a questionnaire survey
AU - Landersoe, Selma Kloeve
AU - Petersen, Kathrine Birch
AU - Vassard, Ditte
AU - Larsen, Elisabeth Clare
AU - Nielsen, Henriette Svarre
AU - Pinborg, Anja
AU - Nøhr, Bugge
AU - Nyboe Andersen, Anders
AU - Schmidt, Lone
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objective: The combined oral contraceptive pill is the most preferred contraceptive method worldwide. Despite high life-time prevalence of infertility of 16-26%, scarce data about concerns of future fertility among COC users are available. We aimed to study whether COC usage induces concerns about fertility. Methods: Online questionnaire-based survey included 1283 current COC users and 1006 past users. The questionnaire covered knowledge and concerns of various aspects of fertility with respect to COC usage. Results: Significantly, more current users (66%) than past users (52%) had considered whether or not COC usage could affect future fertility (OR?=?1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9). Nearly 50% of both groups believed COC usage could impair conception rates after discontinuation. Furthermore, 28% current vs. 19% past users believed COC could diminish the ovarian reserve more permanently. Conversely, 14% current and 11% past users believed that lack of ovulation could 'spare' the eggs (OR?=?0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.3). Significantly fewer current users (22%) vs. past users (35%) had heard, primarily by female friends, that a short break of 1-2 months during long-term COC usage was healthy, (OR 0.72, 95%CI?=?0.56-0.92). Conclusions: Health care professionals prescribing hormonal contraception should be aware of misapprehensions and concerns of fertility among users of COC.
AB - Objective: The combined oral contraceptive pill is the most preferred contraceptive method worldwide. Despite high life-time prevalence of infertility of 16-26%, scarce data about concerns of future fertility among COC users are available. We aimed to study whether COC usage induces concerns about fertility. Methods: Online questionnaire-based survey included 1283 current COC users and 1006 past users. The questionnaire covered knowledge and concerns of various aspects of fertility with respect to COC usage. Results: Significantly, more current users (66%) than past users (52%) had considered whether or not COC usage could affect future fertility (OR?=?1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9). Nearly 50% of both groups believed COC usage could impair conception rates after discontinuation. Furthermore, 28% current vs. 19% past users believed COC could diminish the ovarian reserve more permanently. Conversely, 14% current and 11% past users believed that lack of ovulation could 'spare' the eggs (OR?=?0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.3). Significantly fewer current users (22%) vs. past users (35%) had heard, primarily by female friends, that a short break of 1-2 months during long-term COC usage was healthy, (OR 0.72, 95%CI?=?0.56-0.92). Conclusions: Health care professionals prescribing hormonal contraception should be aware of misapprehensions and concerns of fertility among users of COC.
KW - Combined oral contraception
KW - fertility awareness
KW - fertility concerns
KW - misapprehensions
KW - ovarian reserve
U2 - 10.1080/13625187.2019.1639659
DO - 10.1080/13625187.2019.1639659
M3 - Article
C2 - 31317795
SN - 1362-5187
VL - 24
SP - 347
EP - 355
JO - European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care
JF - European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care
IS - 5
ER -