Abstract
One thousand seven hundred ninety-one diarrheic stool samples were cultivated for Campylobacter spp. We found a high prevalence of Campylobacter concisus with use of a polycarbonate filter (n = 114) compared to a cellulose acetate filter (n = 79) (P < .0001). The polycarbonate filter is superior to the commonly used cellulose acetate filter for detection of C. concisus.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Sider (fra-til) | 549-550 |
| Antal sider | 2 |
| Tidsskrift | Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease |
| Vol/bind | 76 |
| Udgave nummer | 4 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 1 aug. 2013 |
Fingeraftryk
Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'Comparison of polycarbonate and cellulose acetate membrane filters for isolation of Campylobacter concisus from stool samples' indeholder.Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver