Comparison of polycarbonate and cellulose acetate membrane filters for isolation of Campylobacter concisus from stool samples

Hans Linde Nielsen*, Jørgen Engberg, Tove Ejlertsen, Henrik Nielsen

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftArtikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

One thousand seven hundred ninety-one diarrheic stool samples were cultivated for Campylobacter spp. We found a high prevalence of Campylobacter concisus with use of a polycarbonate filter (n = 114) compared to a cellulose acetate filter (n = 79) (P < .0001). The polycarbonate filter is superior to the commonly used cellulose acetate filter for detection of C. concisus.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Sider (fra-til)549-550
Antal sider2
TidsskriftDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Vol/bind76
Udgave nummer4
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 aug. 2013

Fingeraftryk

Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'Comparison of polycarbonate and cellulose acetate membrane filters for isolation of Campylobacter concisus from stool samples' indeholder.

Citationsformater