Comparison of different stepwise screening strategies for type 2 diabetes: Finding from Danish general practice, Addition-DK

Aim: To examine attendance, number of people with T2DM and costs of three different stepwise screening strategies for T2DM in general practice (GP). Methods: Diabetes risk questionnaires were mailed to individuals aged 40-69 years from 45 general practices in 2001-2002 and individuals at high risk for T2DM, were asked to contact their GP to arrange a screening test. In 2005-2006, 26 general practices were randomised into two different opportunistic screening programmes (OP-direct and OP-subsequent) and risk questionnaires were distributed to individuals aged 40-69 years during GP consultations. In the OP-direct approach, high-risk individuals were offered to start the screening during the actual consultation while high-risk individuals in the OP-subsequent approach, were invited to a screening test at a later date. We report attendance, number of people with T2DM and costs of each screening approach. Results: The mail-distributed approach identified 0.8% of the target population with T2DM, the OP-direct approach and the OP-subsequent approach, 0.9% and 0.5% respectively. Cost per person with T2DM was in the mail-distributed approach: 1058, OP-direct approach: 707 and the OP-subsequent approach: 727. Conclusion: This study indicates that opportunistic screening identifies the same level of unknown diabetes as a mail-distributed approach but with lower costs.