Commentaries: Has cytology become obsolete as a primary test in screening for cervical cancer?

Matejka Rebolj^*, Elsebeth Lynge

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Sider (fra-til)	1-2
Antal sider	2
Tidsskrift	Journal of Medical Screening
Vol/bind	17
Udgave nummer	1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1258/jms.2009.009098
Status	Udgivet - 1 mar. 2010

Adgang til dokumentet

@article{fe6b1c06b64d4ef0adb3717b2925ead4,

title = "Commentaries: Has cytology become obsolete as a primary test in screening for cervical cancer?",

author = "Matejka Rebolj and Elsebeth Lynge",

year = "2010",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1258/jms.2009.009098",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "1--2",

journal = "Journal of Medical Screening",

issn = "0969-1413",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentaries

T2 - Has cytology become obsolete as a primary test in screening for cervical cancer?

AU - Rebolj, Matejka

AU - Lynge, Elsebeth

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950646075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1258/jms.2009.009098

DO - 10.1258/jms.2009.009098

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 20356936

AN - SCOPUS:77950646075

SN - 0969-1413

VL - 17

SP - 1

EP - 2

JO - Journal of Medical Screening

JF - Journal of Medical Screening

IS - 1

ER -