TY - JOUR
T1 - Brief rapport
T2 - Perceptual aberration in patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis
AU - Clemmensen, Lars
AU - Kristensen, Tina Dam
AU - Wenneberg, Christina
AU - Rimvall, Martin Køster
AU - Nordentoft, Merete
AU - Glenthoej, Louise
N1 - © 2023 The Authors. Early Intervention in Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Ultra-high risk (UHR) is considered a forerunner of psychosis, but most UHR individuals do not later convert, yet remain symptomatic, disabled and help-seeking. Thus, there is an increased recognition of the UHR phenotype as a syndrome in itself, rather than merely a risk syndrome. It is therefore essential to investigate outcomes other than transition to psychosis. For this purpose, perceptual aberration appears to be a distinct, as well as a stable and less state-specific vulnerability indicator. We aimed to investigate perceptual aberration and associations with functional, neuro and social cognitive risk factors in an UHR sample.METHOD: One hundred and twenty UHR and 64 healthy controls were compared on levels of perceptual aberration using the perceptual aberration scale. We further investigated cross-sectional associations between perceptual aberration and CAARMS (as a measure of subthreshold psychotic symptoms) and functional, neuro and social cognitive risk factors within the UHR using Spearmans ρ.RESULTS: Perceptual aberration was significantly higher in UHR than in healthy controls and was associated with social functioning, executive functioning, and emotion recognition.CONCLUSION: Our findings are consistent with a view of perceptual aberration as a stable vulnerability indicator that varies little with clinical state.
AB - BACKGROUND: Ultra-high risk (UHR) is considered a forerunner of psychosis, but most UHR individuals do not later convert, yet remain symptomatic, disabled and help-seeking. Thus, there is an increased recognition of the UHR phenotype as a syndrome in itself, rather than merely a risk syndrome. It is therefore essential to investigate outcomes other than transition to psychosis. For this purpose, perceptual aberration appears to be a distinct, as well as a stable and less state-specific vulnerability indicator. We aimed to investigate perceptual aberration and associations with functional, neuro and social cognitive risk factors in an UHR sample.METHOD: One hundred and twenty UHR and 64 healthy controls were compared on levels of perceptual aberration using the perceptual aberration scale. We further investigated cross-sectional associations between perceptual aberration and CAARMS (as a measure of subthreshold psychotic symptoms) and functional, neuro and social cognitive risk factors within the UHR using Spearmans ρ.RESULTS: Perceptual aberration was significantly higher in UHR than in healthy controls and was associated with social functioning, executive functioning, and emotion recognition.CONCLUSION: Our findings are consistent with a view of perceptual aberration as a stable vulnerability indicator that varies little with clinical state.
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Emotions
KW - Executive Function
KW - Humans
KW - Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
KW - Psychotic Disorders/psychology
KW - Risk Factors
U2 - 10.1111/eip.13445
DO - 10.1111/eip.13445
M3 - Article
C2 - 37257880
SN - 1751-7885
VL - 18
SP - 63
EP - 68
JO - Early intervention in psychiatry
JF - Early intervention in psychiatry
IS - 1
ER -