Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents

Adnan Kastrati*, Julinda Mehilli, Jürgen Pache, Christoph Kaiser, Marco Valgimigli, Henning Kelbæk, Maurizio Menichelli, Manel Sabaté, Maarten J. Suttorp, Dietrich Baumgart, Melchior Seyfarth, Matthias E. Pfisterer, Albert Schömig

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftArtikelForskningpeer review

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: The long-term effects of treatment with sirolimus-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, have not been established. METHODS: We performed an analysis of individual data on 4958 patients enrolled in 14 randomized trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents (mean followup interval, 12.1 to 58.9 months). The primary end point was death from any cause. Other outcomes were stent thrombosis, the composite end point of death or myocardial infarction, and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or reintervention. RESULTS: The overall risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.30) and the combined risk of death or myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.16) were not significantly different for patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents. There was a significant reduction in the combined risk of death, myocardial infarction, or reintervention (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.54) associated with the use of sirolimus-eluting stents. There was no significant difference in the overall risk of stent thrombosis with sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.86). However, there was evidence of a slight increase in the risk of stent thrombosis associated with sirolimus-eluting stents after the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The use of sirolimus-eluting stents does not have a significant effect on overall long-term survival and survival free of myocardial infarction, as compared with bare-metal stents. There is a sustained reduction in the need for reintervention after the use of sirolimus-eluting stents. The risk of stent thrombosis is at least as great as that seen with bare-metal stents.

    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Sider (fra-til)1030-1039
    Antal sider10
    TidsskriftNew England Journal of Medicine
    Vol/bind356
    Udgave nummer10
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 8 mar. 2007

    Fingeraftryk

    Udforsk hvilke forskningsemner 'Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents' indeholder.

    Citationsformater