TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized multifactorial intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease (Inter99)
T2 - The long-term effect on physical activity
AU - Von Huth Smith, Lisa
AU - Ladelund, Steen
AU - Jørgensen, Torben
AU - Borch-Johnsen, Knut
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - Aim: To examine the effect of a randomized multiple risk factor intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) on the development in physical activity over a 36-month period. Methods: Two random samples (high intensity intervention, group A, n=11,708; low intensity intervention, group B, n=1,308) were invited for a health examination, an assessment of absolute risk of developing IHD, and an individualized lifestyle intervention. The participation rate was 52.5%. High-risk persons in group A were also offered diet/physical activity and/or smoking cessation group counselling. High-risk persons in group B were referred to their GP. High-risk persons were re-counselled after 12 and 36 months. The control group (group C, n=5,264, response rate=61.3%) answered a mailed questionnaire. Data were analysed using longitudinal linear regression models with random effects. Main outcome: Change in physical activity from baseline to 12-and 36-month follow-up. Results: In men, the high-intensity (group A) intervention had a beneficial effect at 12-month follow-up, whereas after 36 months both the high-intensity and the low-intensity (group B) intervention had a beneficial effect on the development in physical activity when compared with group C. This was regardless of baseline physical activity level. At 36-month follow-up there was no significant difference between groups A and B. There was no intervention effect among women. Conclusions: Only men seemed to benefit from the intervention.
AB - Aim: To examine the effect of a randomized multiple risk factor intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) on the development in physical activity over a 36-month period. Methods: Two random samples (high intensity intervention, group A, n=11,708; low intensity intervention, group B, n=1,308) were invited for a health examination, an assessment of absolute risk of developing IHD, and an individualized lifestyle intervention. The participation rate was 52.5%. High-risk persons in group A were also offered diet/physical activity and/or smoking cessation group counselling. High-risk persons in group B were referred to their GP. High-risk persons were re-counselled after 12 and 36 months. The control group (group C, n=5,264, response rate=61.3%) answered a mailed questionnaire. Data were analysed using longitudinal linear regression models with random effects. Main outcome: Change in physical activity from baseline to 12-and 36-month follow-up. Results: In men, the high-intensity (group A) intervention had a beneficial effect at 12-month follow-up, whereas after 36 months both the high-intensity and the low-intensity (group B) intervention had a beneficial effect on the development in physical activity when compared with group C. This was regardless of baseline physical activity level. At 36-month follow-up there was no significant difference between groups A and B. There was no intervention effect among women. Conclusions: Only men seemed to benefit from the intervention.
KW - Exercise
KW - ischaemic heart disease
KW - lifestyle
KW - randomized intervention study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44849129234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1403494807085313
DO - 10.1177/1403494807085313
M3 - Article
C2 - 18539692
AN - SCOPUS:44849129234
SN - 1403-4948
VL - 36
SP - 380
EP - 388
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
IS - 4
ER -