TY - JOUR
T1 - A Computerised Sampling Strategy for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Lithium Provides Precise Estimates and Significantly Reduces Dose-Finding Time
AU - Hoegberg, Lotte Christine Groth
AU - Jürgens, Gesche
AU - Zederkof, Vivian Wederking
AU - Holgersson, Bettina
AU - Andersson, John Erik
AU - Dalhoff, Kim Peder
AU - Larsen, Ejnar Bundgaard
AU - Angelo, Helle Riis
PY - 2012/3/1
Y1 - 2012/3/1
N2 - The clinical benefit of implementing Bayesian approach for lithium drug monitoring was evaluated. Intervention group (N=42) and historical control group (N=55) patients were each divided into two groups: Dosage with immediate-release lithium carbonate or a sustained-release formulation, lithium citrate. Bayesian approach was performed in the intervention groups, and estimation of lithium steady-state trough concentration was obtained from non-steady-state blood sample, collected about 12hr after the first lithium study dose. The estimate was compared with the actually measured steady-state concentration. In the control group, lithium monitoring was traditionally performed as steady-state blood sampling. Predicted and measured lithium concentrations were comparable. The desired lithium dose was reached significantly faster in the intervention group compared to control; 2.47±2.22days versus 9.96±11.24days (mean±S.D.) (p=0.0003). Bayesian approach was an advantage for the clinicians as a fast and safe aid to obtain the optimal lithium treatment dose.
AB - The clinical benefit of implementing Bayesian approach for lithium drug monitoring was evaluated. Intervention group (N=42) and historical control group (N=55) patients were each divided into two groups: Dosage with immediate-release lithium carbonate or a sustained-release formulation, lithium citrate. Bayesian approach was performed in the intervention groups, and estimation of lithium steady-state trough concentration was obtained from non-steady-state blood sample, collected about 12hr after the first lithium study dose. The estimate was compared with the actually measured steady-state concentration. In the control group, lithium monitoring was traditionally performed as steady-state blood sampling. Predicted and measured lithium concentrations were comparable. The desired lithium dose was reached significantly faster in the intervention group compared to control; 2.47±2.22days versus 9.96±11.24days (mean±S.D.) (p=0.0003). Bayesian approach was an advantage for the clinicians as a fast and safe aid to obtain the optimal lithium treatment dose.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857370516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2011.00800.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2011.00800.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 21933347
AN - SCOPUS:84857370516
SN - 1742-7835
VL - 110
SP - 259
EP - 263
JO - Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
JF - Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
IS - 3
ER -